![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
SGC wins again, eh? They're the most consistent in my mind, and I know it's not a huge sample (or even anything larger than a small sample), but I had two T206 cards returned to me for evidence of "cleaning/soaking." Now the cards looked nice, but I wasn't sure how they knew it was cleaned or soaked, so I sent those cards back in with a lot of about 40 other T206 cards, and, wouldn't you know it, those two came back unslabbed as "cleaning/soaking" again. I'm not wasting my money on a third time. But I've sent water soaked cards (you know, to get glue off the backs) into SGC before with no problems. What are people cleaining/soaking cards with to get them brighter? And how does SGC know how to detect it? (I guess, I also want to know why they care?) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My PSA Experiment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 05-01-2008 06:17 PM |
My experiment on the BST | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 03-03-2007 04:24 PM |
My $1,000 Experiment: How to Spend? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-16-2005 07:10 PM |
attn: Trae R. Credit card experiment paying off | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-03-2005 01:00 AM |
An experiment with PRO | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 01-05-2003 02:26 AM |