 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
06-04-2005, 04:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Scenario~Your Opinions
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Andrew, you're obviously 100 percent right. That you didn't immediately send it in to be graded is a ridiculous red herring; how is Lew1 prejudiced by you taking 30 days instead of 5 1to submit it and find out it was trimmed? What would have been fair is for him to have paid to have it sent to PSA and/or GAI after the failure at SGC. If it came back graded, no harm no foul. If it came back trimmed again, a full refund should have been provided. After all, a card encapsulated by a major grading company is an investment; a card with a letter from Lew saying that it's not trimmed is a joke. Why is it that most sellers have to be such aholes? If you sell something, stand behind it! Is that such a hard concept to remember? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Worst case scenario....get a divorce and wife gets half your collection? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 03-10-2007 09:27 AM |
| Opinions please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-08-2007 04:49 PM |
| need opinions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 02-01-2005 02:33 PM |
| Opinions Please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 11-30-2004 03:49 PM |
| Opinions on this? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-14-2003 12:57 PM |
Threaded Mode