![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
Without seeing the card in person I am going to go off of the scan. I see a very slight amount of paper loss on the back, left side of the bottom adhesive stain and two overall adhesive stains. I've seen PSA inconsistently grade cards like this. I have OJ cards graded PSA6 that have obvious adhesive staining and I also have a load of cards with adhesive staining graded in the "2" range. In any case the grading companies are very inconsistent. OJ collectors are pretty much in line with trying to get a clear picture first and then scrutinizing the back second. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS:T205 Ty Cobb, Front is NM/MT, Back From PSA! Good 2 ! Offers? | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 26 | 08-06-2008 11:41 PM |
Does this VG/EX 4 have paperloss on back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-17-2008 07:12 PM |
1933 Blue Bird Babe Ruth Front View PSA 6 (Pictures Uploaded) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-29-2007 07:33 PM |
Paperloss on Front + PSA = 4 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 07-17-2006 06:27 PM |
PSA Submissions received back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 10-31-2001 08:05 AM |