 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
04-17-2005, 07:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Are 1948 Leaf's Considered Vintage?
Posted By: Brian Goldner
In my humble opinion, yes, although i suspect that a number of other board members might disagree. Timelines for what is considered Vintage, vary from Collector to Collector. I believe that a common Vintage timeline to many, might be when the U.S. became involved in WWII. To a major extent, i agree with that point of view, but my timeline, which is directly tied to baseball, is 1957, the last season that the Dodgers played in Brooklyn, and the Giants in New York. However, it is acknowledged that only a small percentage of cards issued in the 1948-1957 time period, would be considered desirable, by the majority of collectors who post in this forum. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| All things considered - | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-01-2009 07:59 AM |
| What is considered scarcer M116 or T-206? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-21-2007 03:06 PM |
| T206's....show us your BROAD LEAF's | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 134 | 01-09-2007 09:25 AM |
| Why is T206 considered One set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-24-2005 10:56 PM |
| 1948 Bowman... not exactly vintage but does this look good? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-29-2003 12:27 AM |
Threaded Mode