![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
I suspect if you looked at it under a 10x loop and the proper lighting that you would find either a small wrinkle (front or back) or a very very minor spot of paper loss on the back. I have well over 100 SGC graded T206 cards and they are by far more consistent than the 40 PSA graded T206 cards I have. And the SGC cards that I think should be 60's or higher, get 40's or 50's because of very hard to see wrinkles or small dots of paper loss on the reverse. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1884 Baseball game card SGC-88 | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-11-2008 05:51 PM |
SGC Grading Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-17-2008 05:39 PM |
SGC grading times | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-03-2007 12:38 AM |
SGC will not be grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-07-2006 12:56 PM |
SGC grading of this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 55 | 02-02-2006 11:36 AM |