 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
03-24-2005, 09:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
PSA v. SGC
Posted By: JimB
Several years ago I submitted a card I was sure was going to get an 8 and possibly a 9. When it came back PSA 6, I was really upset. I resubmitted it raw a few months later and it came back a 6 again. I went to the PSA booth at a show to ask why and they argued there was an extremely faint wrinkle on this otherwise mint card and that 6 was the highest grade a card could get with a wrinkle. Now this "wrinkle" (if it even exists) is so faint that it is dificult to see under 10X magnification and I personally think it is b.s. It looks like the natural unevenness of cardboard to me. To their credit, they did give this mint card the same grade twice in a row. I happily have the card out of any authenticator's holder now. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTT T205 Cobb PSA 4 for T206 Cy Young Port. PSA/SGC 4-5 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-03-2008 11:08 PM |
| WTT for aT206 Magie SGC 10 or PSA 1 or PSA A | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-21-2008 08:24 PM |
| W600 Krueger SGC 50 Pitt., Curtis Ireland Holke SGC 60, Willards Hornsby PSA 2mk for sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-27-2008 03:01 PM |
| PSA 1 p-f vs. SGC 10 and SGC 20 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-08-2006 10:07 AM |
| PSA 9 v. SGC 9 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-27-2005 11:12 AM |
Threaded Mode