 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
03-24-2005, 08:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
PSA v. SGC
Posted By: Howie
Maybe your expectations are too unrealistic. Pop them out and send them to SGC and see what they have to say. My guess is that the grades from the two companies will be similar. Simply paying a lot of money for raw cards won't guaranty that you're getting what you think you're paying extra for. The person who sold you the cards is to blame, not the grading company who's giving you the bad news. Expecting to get a Gem-Mint grade on a 1956 Campanella that was purchased in the last 10 years from a dealer or Ebay is hopeless. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTT T205 Cobb PSA 4 for T206 Cy Young Port. PSA/SGC 4-5 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-03-2008 11:08 PM |
| WTT for aT206 Magie SGC 10 or PSA 1 or PSA A | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-21-2008 08:24 PM |
| W600 Krueger SGC 50 Pitt., Curtis Ireland Holke SGC 60, Willards Hornsby PSA 2mk for sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-27-2008 03:01 PM |
| PSA 1 p-f vs. SGC 10 and SGC 20 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-08-2006 10:07 AM |
| PSA 9 v. SGC 9 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-27-2005 11:12 AM |
Threaded Mode