![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Robert
I started this post and glad to see that there has been so much feedback. My point is this I realize that there are special circumstances such as rare backs and error cards and what not. But my opinion is that a common PSA 8 should not be worth more then a HOF PSA 7. It disgusts me that a common is worth more then say a Mathewson card one grade lower. There just is something seriously wrong with tath scenario. As far as population reports are considered there has to be a lot less cards submitted for common players then the hall of fammers so I do not give that stat much leverage. Yes you can get cards at a decent price that are PSA 5 and below but once you try for anything above the prices increase expotentially. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
insane E-card prices again? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 08-25-2008 12:58 PM |
Insane Caramel Prices | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-08-2006 03:51 PM |
T206 commons to trade for other T206 commons. | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-06-2006 06:10 PM |
T206 insane Southern League | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-15-2005 08:45 AM |
Insane price for Coveleski | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-22-2005 03:31 PM |