![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: PASJD
To me, MW's personal observation that the card "definitely" looked different is quite powerful and disturbing and the most directly relevant thing I have seen posted yet. In a sense I agree with Leon that at this point it almost doesn't matter, the card has a life of its own as an icon whether it is trimmed or not, but on the other hand, what does it say about PSA if they made a mistake (and I will assume for argument's sake it was an innocent mistake) right off the bat with a card of that magnitude? |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(4) PSA Graded Card Boxes - SOLD! | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 2 | 04-05-2009 09:53 PM |
1934 Goudey 17 card lot - PSA & SGC Graded | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-01-2009 07:59 PM |
SGC graded N302 Mayo, PSA graded 67 Topps Seaver Rookie on Ebay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 08-21-2008 10:01 AM |
Very nice PSA graded 1928 Geo. H. Ruth Candy Co. card on eBay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-28-2008 02:17 PM |
Vintage PSA Graded Card Review | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-10-2006 09:25 AM |