![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
PSA and SGC both labeled them vg, which I generally agree with if the card is otherwise nice looking. If the card has significant wear, call it good at best. If the writing is on the front and affects the image, fair to good, or poor if there are other significant problems. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Talking about escalating values - M101-4/5 backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 07-02-2007 12:04 PM |
E125 Values | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-29-2007 10:01 AM |
autograph values? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-05-2006 09:14 PM |
Baseball ticket values | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 06-28-2004 10:12 AM |
Values for T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-11-2003 08:50 PM |