![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
Well Barry, you are an icon to dad and I. Anyway, you are absolutely correct! Though I think the new INVESTORS not necessarily collectors, have supported this pathetic change. People (and I will be nice here) are buying the grade or number on the slab instead of the card, that is the problem. I watched Bill Huggins pull a 1963 topps common out of his $4 binder and have it slabbed at the PSA booth in Chantilly some years back. It came back a 9 and he sold it at his table for $400. Now I don't care what that card slabbed at, a 1963 common is worth $4 no matter what. I just hope that one day, the bottom drops out of this pathetic course and the morons carrying around the 9's and 10's they paid a thousand times more than they are worth, become only what the card is worth again. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Four Base Hits Kelly and Website | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 03-23-2008 01:09 PM |
O/T Four Base Hits | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 01-02-2008 07:34 PM |
Four Base Hits Scans | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-07-2006 09:08 AM |
Four Base Hits | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-29-2004 09:57 PM |
700 ebay hits and no takers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-04-2001 05:55 AM |