![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: The other One (Julie)
but if Nick and David are talking about the same proofs--David, did you see the scans on the A.H. auction page? ...and David has examined them in person (NOT on the internet), I cannot imagine him being wrong. A fairly high-powered microscope should settle the question once and for all (he advised me buy a 100X one--it has lenses of 100, 80, 40 and 10X). |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old Judge Proofs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-07-2006 10:17 AM |
The 'Old Judge Proofs' | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-15-2004 12:36 PM |
Old Judge "Proofs" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-12-2003 06:53 AM |
N-167 Old Judge Proofs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-10-2003 10:06 AM |
Old Judge proofs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-06-2003 05:32 PM |