![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I feel the most important factor in grading an Old Judge is photo quality. What would you rather have- an N172 with a little corner wear, a bit of back damage, but a perfectly clear and rich photo; or one with square corners, clean back, but a light and blurry photo? Unfortunately, the grading services will give a higher grade to the latter. No factor is more appealing in an Old Judge than a rich photo, which should always be given extra consideration. But it never is. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do you display the back damage? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-25-2007 08:15 PM |
Back damage on 1915 Cracker Jacks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-21-2007 06:38 PM |
T206 Cincinnati Cards Nice fronts with back damage | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-10-2007 06:21 AM |
Scrapbook damage and grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-31-2005 05:31 PM |
back damage to a Mayo | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-26-2004 07:13 AM |