![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
The description was confusing. I interpret it as meaning the image was shot in 1905 and the photo made in 1920. If the image is crystal clear, it's possible it was made from the original negative. Many news services would keep the original negatives around, so that would be possible. If the image is rougher (less detail, blurrier, etc), chances are it was not from the original negative. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can somone help with this [Lelands] photo - revisited | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-15-2009 12:52 AM |
Mathewson T206 Portrait question | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 01-09-2008 11:45 AM |
Mathewson T206 Portrait question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-07-2008 10:10 AM |
Ruth photo sells for $26,349.02 in lelands | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 12-08-2007 07:37 AM |
Question on authenticity of T206 Mathewson which leads to a rookie grading dilemma... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-10-2007 07:37 AM |