![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian H (misunderestimated)
I think one would be hard pressed to argue that it doesn't bring the grade way down (that's how all collectors and grading services I have ever dealt with would view it).... But Julie's point is certainly valid: it is like an Old Judge with back problems in that it doesn't bother me personally nearly as much as it would with an issue that had something printed on the back in the first place. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do you display the back damage? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-25-2007 08:15 PM |
Back damage on 1915 Cracker Jacks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-21-2007 06:38 PM |
T206 Cincinnati Cards Nice fronts with back damage | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-10-2007 06:21 AM |
t206 Boston Find and Back Damage | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 07-20-2006 03:34 PM |
Grading vintage cards with back damage | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-04-2004 07:03 PM |