![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
And overexposure (too much brightness) is typical of reprints. Don't know either the "auction seller" as listed, or who else you could mean--he certainly isn't Sports Cards Plus, in any case, who, I should think, would have no need to rip people off calling something "vintage" when it was a copy. A "1894 WIRE photo"? I supppose it's just barely possible, but i didn't think 19th century newspapers or magazines were into photography at ALL. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1914 Baltimore News Orioles - Ruth | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-02-2008 08:16 AM |
1896 Baltimore Orioles Pinback | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-17-2008 05:15 AM |
1931 Baltimore Orioles Pins Info | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-10-2007 07:17 PM |
The 1894 Alpha-Photo Engraving Baltimore Orioles | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-17-2006 11:46 AM |
1894 Baltimore or 1927 Yankees? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 12-31-2005 10:48 AM |