![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: kevin
I want to thank Hankron for his response to my questions about uncut sheets in the earlier thread, it was, by far, the most intelligent answer that I have received. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marc S.
With some issues -- attempts at restoration are quite obvious. Bleaching of 1948 Leaf cards seems to be a very obvious example. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MW
<< I have seen numerous 1915 high-grade Cracker Jack cards that were soaked after having been in an album for perhaps 80-85 years... >> |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff O
"Since it is well know by anybody who has been in this hobby at least 20 years that all of these high grade 8's, 9's and 10s, didn't exist 15 or 20 years ago" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd
<"Since it is well know by anybody who has been in this hobby at least 20 years that all of these high grade 8's, 9's and 10s, didn't exist 15 or 20 years ago"> |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: kevin
Todd, I don't know how long you have been collecting, but if you believe it is a load of crap, you have not been in this hobby long enough. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd
<Todd, I don't know how long you have been collecting, but if you believe it is a load of crap, you have not been in this hobby long enough> |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: TBob
To suggest that "all" high grade specimens of vintage cards are trimmed, fake, or whatever similar point you were driving at is, in my opinion, a load of crap.> |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scgaynor
I am not a fan of broad general statements either but I don't think Kevin is that far out of line. Instead of "all" I would use the word "most". I would say that probably 70% of the pre-war 8's or above didn't exist 15-20 years ago. That is only 7 out of 10, which I think is probably a reasonable amount. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd
I didn't mean to go off on Kevin, as I think he makes some good points in his other thread on cut cards. I just hate broad, conclusory statements. I acknowledge the existence of altered high grade cards, even to the point where I think it's not uncommon--I just don't believe its as rampant as others assert. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin
I would not want give my opinion based only on a scan. Even if you were holding the card in your hand, it might be hard to tell. Once the card is in the holder you can't feel it to see if it is thin, or smell it to see if any chemicals have been used. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
As someone else pointed out, a lot of the high grade vintage stuff has been stashed away in long hobbiest collections. When they change hands, they tend to change hands among that group. I've seen hoardes of cards out there would boggle the mind and you'd say no way. But they do exist. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Obak uncut sheet question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-13-2008 02:55 PM |
W512 uncut sheet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-08-2008 03:35 AM |
W-560 Uncut Sheet | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 02-27-2008 03:40 PM |
Question regarding 1961 Fleer FB uncut sheet | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 4 | 12-22-2007 08:22 AM |
Old Judge uncut sheet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-16-2003 10:11 PM |