 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
03-04-2003, 04:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
PSA vs. SGC
Posted By: scott brockelman
i don't think the comparison everyone strives for will ever gel. in this case, as it should be in every case, buy the card not the holder. the psa card had a slight stain but no creases(at least that i could see) and a nice image. the sgc card was heavily creased in the corner and not as nice appearing. IF the cards were raw and laying side by side, i would have paid more for the psa example, and if they were graded 2, i would have done the same. you can not blindly buy a card based on the numeric grade. you have to see it and determine for yourself the asthetic value. had the cards been flip flopped in their respective holders the nicer card would have still brought more. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTT T205 Cobb PSA 4 for T206 Cy Young Port. PSA/SGC 4-5 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-03-2008 11:08 PM |
| WTT for aT206 Magie SGC 10 or PSA 1 or PSA A | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-21-2008 08:24 PM |
| W600 Krueger SGC 50 Pitt., Curtis Ireland Holke SGC 60, Willards Hornsby PSA 2mk for sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-27-2008 03:01 PM |
| PSA 1 p-f vs. SGC 10 and SGC 20 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-08-2006 10:07 AM |
| PSA 9 v. SGC 9 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-27-2005 11:12 AM |
Threaded Mode