![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
I agree with Julie on the fact that I prefer paper loss (only on the back of cards), but only to issue that have nothing of signifigance on the back, like a bio or stats. I hate T202's with back damage but don't mind them with center creases, whereas T206's I would take back damage over creases, especially on the face. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
border chipping vs paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-06-2008 02:40 PM |
fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 05:17 PM |
A Grading Question-regarding Paper Loss! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-30-2007 08:12 PM |
chipping vs. paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-12-2007 03:55 PM |
paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |