 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-01-2002, 05:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Overgraded SGC Ramly
Posted By: Paul
Thanks for the quote from SGC's website. This card certainly fits within SGC's own definition of VG. I just didn't think that "heavy crease(s)" or "pinholes" or a "tear" or "ink" (at least on the front) could ever qualify as VG. I guess SGC just has very strict standards for the high grades, and very loose (but openly stated) standards for the low grades. Of course, that still doesn't explain why that really nice caramel Wagner is a 2. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| looking for Ramly Hof's 3 or better SGC only | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-12-2006 01:42 PM |
| t204 Ramly Johnson SGC 20 & e107 Plank SGC 10 available | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-31-2006 06:54 AM |
| Overgraded cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 12-26-2005 01:49 PM |
| More overgraded cards from Mr. X | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-17-2005 11:36 PM |
| An Overgraded Reprint ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-22-2003 10:04 PM |
Hybrid Mode
