 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
02-01-2002, 06:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Strongly against the "Authentic" grade
Posted By: Jay Miller
Hal---Why does it matter where your card ranks? If you have a nice card and you are happy with the way it looks, isn't that enough. Even if you had a card that was listed by PSA as the best known, does that mean that is the best copy in the hobby? Perhaps there is a better card graded by SGC, or GAI or NASA 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Novice question: PSA "Authentic" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-26-2007 02:28 PM |
| Where is the line between a "1" and "Authentic"? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-02-2006 04:21 PM |
| Problems with requesting an "authentic" grade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-27-2006 06:44 AM |
| Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
| GAI dropping the "authentic" grading classification | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 01-23-2005 08:31 AM |
. More likely, there are better cards in vintage collections where the owners would never have the cards graded. I think the grading company population reports are of limited value for pre-1900 cards because so few of the cards are actually submitted. Having the best known PSA card may be no more than being the big fish in the little pond.
Threaded Mode