Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards
Would what I know right now hold up in court? No. If I was gong to court do I think I could prove it, mmmmm, probably. I'm not a coder but I did stay at a Holiday Inn.
The AI coding specific tasks and then trying to string them together to make a cohesive site could certainly lead to the weird functionality issues like snipe bids ending auctions early.
If you only tested each function in a vacuum and didn't try every piece of the code in place as a whole it would likely lead to what we saw. There was also information embedded in the code that wasn't part of the code, but telling you what the code was intended to do. That's pretty standard for AI generated code, and completely unnecessary and odd to have in there. No human would ever do that.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime
Commenting your code is literally best practice and always has been. I'm not saying you're wrong about it being written by AI, but the idea that "no human would ever do that" is not correct.
|
Software dev here, Hammertime is correct.
Some devs insist that inline comments are vital, some insist that they are terrible and that code should be self-documenting (lmao imo), some lie somewhere in between. But it's very common for devs to include inline comments within the source code, and commit them with the code, to production.
Having said all that, code comments that AI embedds sometimes make it extremely clear that the code was written by AI, like :
// here you will add additional business logic
Today, 01:36 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode