![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not familiar with CGC, but lots of chat if they will gain ground in the grading wars.
Your thoughts. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
A recent anecdote on the relative liquidity: When I needed to sell a lot of cards quickly earlier this year, I had no serious interest in my CGC 1 Mantle at $22K, which was my cost. I had several inquiries on Facebook asking what I was trying to hide by keeping it in a CGC slab. I crossed the card over to SGC, where it was graded Authentic Altered. It then sold fairly quickly to a flipper for $22.5K. It was promptly listed for $27K, was bought by another flipper, and was then sold to someone who tried to remove the tape to get a numeric grade. It's changed hands five times since I sold it in February. It's now listed at $33K and will probably be in a PSA slab in the near future. As long as financial considerations drive grading, I think CGC will struggle to gain ground in the sports cards wars. They need big auction houses to start giving them business and hyping them on social media. If that happens, I'm here for it. I've never had a good experience with PSA, and SGC has joined them in the race to the bottom. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks gunboat for that post - very interesting stuff .
Been nice if a collector Could have got it on the cheap instead of a flipper . Gawd - Whoever removed the tape messed up (IMO) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I tend to agree with Mike (Gunboat) above about PSA and inferred liquidity / price issues. PSA and the power of the registry...
Last edited by Zach Wheat; 09-25-2025 at 08:15 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This is all just a long way of saying that I'm thrilled with CGC slabs I've gotten on lower-value cards from Hake's and other places, but they're a huge hindrance when I need to sell because of the stranglehold that PSA and SGC have on the vintage baseball card market. I wish I never needed to worry about value, but the only way I can afford the stuff I want is to sell other stuff. With CGC, I spend all my time fielding questions from people who want assurances that it will cross over to PSA/SGC. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It really depends on the subject. For baseball sure you want to be in PSA or SGC. But step a bit out of the big sports and CGC does pretty well. I know it has not been a hindrance to me. Now that SGC is part of the Evil Empire, I know that some bigger sellers and auctioneers are using CGC. You can see it in the catalogs.
I had a recent very good experience with CGC. Great customer service on a tough esoteric card.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 08-30-2025 at 09:55 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have used CSG/CGC a lot in the past. Grading ranged from under $8 to $10 for bulk when I submitted. I sent in a 30 card bulk order recently for about $10 a card and turnaround times are now 80 days for that service. This is not what people want if CGC wants to be successful. If they could have 20 day turnaround times, they would gain traction. This will cause a lot of people to have a horrific experience and not use them again.
They tend to be very lenient on corners, but just as harsh on surface for vintage. Typically 0.5 to 1 grade higher for similar cards. I sent a few cards to also get reholdered since they have slabs designed for most vintage sets now. They also made their holders able to fit slightly oversized cards since they were designed for Pokémon, which don't vary as much in size as sports cards. The stupid crimped back upset me when I got the cards in them. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great post. It’s interesting that CGC doesn’t hold value even for the most iconic card (or #2) in the hobby. Like most vintage collectors I don’t like the brand but recognize them as “legit” for whatever that’s worth. Many people also want uniformity in their collection and introducing non traditional slabs violates that code, silly as that is. I would have no problem buying a cgc slab and have done so on occasion in the past. But as soon as I have that thing I’m cracking that cardboard out of there. I think there’s one exception, let me double check.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Again, this is the same card that buyers were passing on at $22K when it was in a CGC 1 slab. https://www.ebay.com/itm/357659756396 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Amazing centering" lol.
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You guys laugh, but the centering obsession is ridiculous enough these days that it’s an entirely reasonable thing to say in the listing. (The price, not so much.) Don’t mock the player, mock the game.
Last edited by ASF123; 09-26-2025 at 10:08 AM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And as an added damning fact, this piece is in such rough shape that I don’t understand why someone would pay a premium for the centering. Just seems like you’re focused on the wrong stuff if you’re paying an elevated price for a card in really rough shape that happens to be moderately well centered.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel Last edited by raulus; 09-27-2025 at 10:29 PM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm hopeful that CGC can continue to gain footing - even if it's a longshot. The lack of competition in the grading space now that Collectors pretty much runs everything is defeating / not good for the hobby. PSA has been coasting with major issues for years, decades even - and they certainly have no incentive to change anything right now either. Grading as a part of the hobby isn't going away at this point, I'd just be happy if there was the occasional incentive for improvement or push for change that was more than just talk. That doesn't happen with Collectors only steering the ship.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whoever tried to remove the tape did a horrible job.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting! There's certainly a lot of hatred for CGC on comic boards these days.
![]()
__________________
That government governs best that governs least. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thoughts on SGC Grading | BruinsFan | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 16 | 10-14-2020 07:25 PM |
Thoughts About A Grading Proposal | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-02-2016 09:50 AM |
Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-16-2014 08:58 PM |
Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 11-14-2014 03:36 PM |
Thoughts on grading | ptowncoug3012 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-30-2010 09:52 PM |