Possible fake N172s?

[N300]

If the moderator wants my name I'll gladly provide them that information. I'm just calling out what seems like bad business. Wouldn't you think the same thing? There are several red flags.

[N300]

bcbgcbrcb what's with the attitude? I don't get people like you. What's wrong with giving the group a heads up? It is the right thing to do. If you don't want to give people a warning that is on you, not me.

[Gorditadogg]

Originally Posted by N300

bcbgcbrcb what's with the attitude? I don't get people like you. What's wrong with giving the group a heads up? It is the right thing to do. If you don't want to give people a warning that is on you, not me.

Yes, anonymous shit-trolling is always the right thing to do.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

[N300]

How is that trolling and why do you swear? Isnt that against the forum rules?

Originally Posted by Gorditadogg

Yes, anonymous shit-trolling is always the right thing to do.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

[oldjudge]

With the big caveat that you can't tell from a picture the card looks rebacked to me; I don't see any particular evidence that it is trimmed. It also looks genuine, but again I am looking at a picture and not the actual card.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by N300

If the moderator wants my name I'll gladly provide them that information. I'm just calling out what seems like bad business. Wouldn't you think the same thing? There are several red flags.

I guess it’s fine for you to be hesitant to share your name, and that’s entirely up to you. But the rules around here do require that we all need to know who you are if you’re going to be posting anything that falls under the criteria of expressing an opinion about someone else or a business.

[Eric72]

Originally Posted by N300

If the moderator wants my name I'll gladly provide them that information. I'm just calling out what seems like bad business. Wouldn't you think the same thing? There are several red flags.

You gave the moderator your name when you registered for Net54, no?

[Leon]

Originally Posted by N300

If the moderator wants my name I'll gladly provide them that information. I'm just calling out what seems like bad business. Wouldn't you think the same thing? There are several red flags.

Apparently, you didn't read the main rule on the forum. Look above here, on the right of the Net54baseball logo, where the paragraph is towards the top of the page. In bold letters it says this.

If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it.

You broke that rule and you aren't anonymous any longer. Thanks.

.

[Beercan collector]

Originally Posted by N300

If the moderator wants my name I'll gladly provide them that information. I'm just calling out what seems like bad business. Wouldn't you think the same thing? There are several red flags.

Doesn’t seem like a bad business to me and I’m not seeing several red flags - Not that eBay feedback is the Endall for me but 4227 100% positive . He has a couple listed as skinned and about a half a dozen of the better cards have been SGC graded authentic . Wouldn’t hurt to change the “possibly trimmed” to probably or definitely .. maybe someone that collects N172s Hard could weigh in .