F/s 1967 topps high numbers

[Rich Klein]

Overstating the Obvious here but a $2 1967 Topps Tom Seaver is certainly not issued in 1967. You might get really lucky at a Garage Sale but not in this thread to get on for $2

Regards
Rich

[Gorditadogg]

Originally Posted by Rich Klein

Overstating the Obvious here but a $2 1967 Topps Tom Seaver is certainly not issued in 1967. You might get really lucky at a Garage Sale but not in this thread to get on for $2

Regards
Rich

Rich, thank you for your post. If I ever need someone to overstate the obvious again, I will certainly look to you.

For those of you interested in the Seaver card, I bought a stack of 10 of these for $20. I have my first 67T set in a 3-ring binder. My Seaver is graded and I keep it separate, so I used one of the $2 reprints to fill in the empty spot in the binder page. You may want to do the same.

[Rich Klein]

Just as an FYI, you called it "Maybe a reprint" and use Mr. Seaver's name with your next post you well knew what you had. Don't use the word Maybe next time

Rich

[JollyElm]

Facetious
adj.
Humorously silly or counterproductive for the purpose of sarcastically advocating the opposite (of an idea or statement).

(AL, you got some serious LOLs from the rest of us, especially with the slick Denehy throw-in.)

[tigerdean]

I see both sides and probably better not to post things like that. Too many people out there these days that get bent very easily and then there is permanent bad blood which usually ends up clogging the board with stupid rhetoric. I see it all the time over on the psa forums.

[Gorditadogg]

Updated for sales. Thanks!