![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: If a player's first published item is a post card, is the post card his rookie card? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
64 | 59.26% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 33.33% |
Depends on how rare and when his other cards were produced |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 7.41% |
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only if the PC is part of a set of some kind. Otherwise, it's just a PC.
And, by "set", I mean a collection of PCs that was produced in some sort of quantity, even if only two copies of each PC were printed. Otherwise, it's just a PC. A single known PC of some Negro League HOFer shouldn't be considered a RC or card of any sort simply because there's so little else available on that player. It's just a PC. Same rules apply to cabinet photos of 19th century players, even if more than one copy is known. They may be lovely, but if they're not part of any series, they're photos. I think a lot of the rule-bending, for lack of a better term, can be placed on auction houses trying to squeeze more money out of buyers by convincing (some of) them that items like these can also be considered cards. Clearly, many people have taken the bait. Again, it doesn't make these items any less fetching in most cases, but let's call a spade a spade. I suppose that someone will counter my feelings with pointing out that the Peck & Snyder is considered the first baseball card, yet is not part of a larger set! ![]() These aren't hard and fast rules, but they're my take on it. The best part is that the only rules are those that you have chosen to consider in your own collecting. If you consider that elephant over there to be a card, so be it! More power to you. Last edited by BillyCoxDodgers3B; 05-12-2025 at 08:44 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Some people won't consider regional issues even if they're the same size, type, etc of cards considered "real." Some people won't consider anything that was mailed in to claim even if similar cards were released as a food/item premium. Some people won't consider anything that didn't come in a pack. Some people won't consider anything oversized... or too undersized...or stamps...or leathers...or wrappers (Overland Candy)...etc... I consider non-oversized regional issues RC's if they're the earliest cards. I know numerous people that would not... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Players Who Had Solo Rookie Cards Before Appearing On Multi Player Rookie Cards | Cliff Bowman | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 23 | 08-17-2022 08:04 AM |
Frank Schulte Show....post your T-cards, Candy cards, etc. of him | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 03-29-2022 10:36 AM |
Let's talk about "over-looked" true Rookie cards....Pre-war and early Post-war | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 214 | 07-08-2021 12:40 PM |
WTB: Robin Yount and Paul Molitor Perez Steele cards/post cards | SkubeBats | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 04-01-2013 02:07 PM |
For sale list cards,books,pins,uncut 1961 Post cards,misc... | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 01-11-2009 07:46 AM |