I switched back to raw cards and my happiness increased 1000%

[Balticfox]

Originally Posted by Big J

In the past year I have moved all of mine out of ring binders into ringless. The downside is that you can't see the back without taking them out.

I don't understand. Ringless binders? And how can you not see the backs of the cards? Do you have any pictures?

[Big J]

Originally Posted by Balticfox

I don't understand. Ringless binders? And how can you not see the backs of the cards? Do you have any pictures?

I'm not sure how to put pictures on here, but the binder has no rings in it and the pages are attached to the inside of spine. All of the pages have sleeves on both sides so you put the cards in the front and back of each page. You cannot see the back of the cards unless you pull them out of the sleeves they are in or put the back side of the card facing out.

[jiw98]

IMG_1202.jpg
Ringless binder. Can be purchased on Amazon.You can get them in various sizes.

[Balticfox]

Originally Posted by jiw98

Ringless binder. Can be purchased on Amazon.You can get them in various sizes.

Not for me. I need the flexibility to keep adding pages to a binder(s) because my collections are open ended.

[bxb]

Boog is a free man, once again:


https://www.net54baseball.com/attach...1&d=1747132280

Next stop: the 1967 binder.