 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-17-2025, 01:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Ooof, that stinks. “Poor” has literally lost all reality-based meaning in grading. The PSA scan makes the card look even better. The only thing I can see as a possible imagined atrocity is maybe some light scuffing/print loss like on the inside his left knee. But even surface wear like that is supposed to be eligible for the 4 or 5 range.
__________________
. || || \/ If you want a deal, you might not get a card. If you want a card, you might not get a deal. 
|
|
#2
04-17-2025, 07:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm convinced sending anything to PSA these days is equivalent to using a randomizer to select a grade. There is no way that card is a 1 in any world. I'm also convinced that SGC grades more accurately and I like their holders better for vintage anyway.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Guess the grade | MGoBlue2007 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 02-20-2023 07:40 PM |
| Guess The Grade | cammb | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 47 | 11-14-2021 03:18 PM |
| GUESS THE GRADE: Jordan Rookie *GRADE IS IN* | scmavl | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 60 | 03-30-2021 08:50 AM |
| Guess the grade? | KCRfan1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-15-2013 07:03 AM |
| Guess The Grade ? | Qcards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 04-16-2013 08:03 AM |
Hybrid Mode
