My Latest submit to SGC - Results - Tell me what u think

[perezfan]

Originally Posted by Bill77

Not to beat a dead horse, but the problem with the Skinner is that it is mis-cut. Just measure the boarder under the 1st B in Bob and compare it to the boarder under the s in Pirates. my guess is PSA would have graded it a 5 MC.

Oh come on.... there is no way that Skinner gets designated as "miscut". And as for that being the reason for the "3"... I highly doubt it. More likely, there's a faint wrinkle or crease that doesn't show up in the scan.

There an infinite number of cards with far more severe "tilting" and diamond cuts that grade 6 and even 7. Just peruse eBay for 5 minutes, and you'll see how far TPGs have recently moved the goalposts.

If there is no hidden crease, that card would have been at least a "5" (probably better) if graded five or more years ago.

[toledo_mudhen]

Originally Posted by perezfan

Oh come on.... there is no way that Skinner gets designated as "miscut".

If there is no hidden crease, that card would have been at least a "5" (probably better) if graded five or more years ago.

Agreed - TY

Just to be clear - This card has caused me to go online and purchase a "digital" microscope just because the issue was making me a bit "nutty"

This would be the one -
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08G43G8ZV...fed_asin_title

This is a 100X digital scope used for looking close at larger objects.

NO Creases, wrinkles or indents present themselves on either side of the Skinner at 100X magnification.