Cards From The B/S/T Finally Arrived!

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

I don't give a flying fk if its over $1.50, refusing to promptly forward tracking information when asked is bad form to say the least. Seems like this long time board member just went out of his way to pick a fight that could have been defused in 15 seconds.

Exactly. Seems many are missing the whole point here, when they talk about $15, or whether the cards were shipped and/or will be delivered (see below).

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

exactly. Barring a horrific accident, the cards are coming

This has nothing to do with the point. The point is that seller appears to have not provided the tracking number. That's not ok, regardless if the cards show up.

[robw1959]

But he did provide the tracking number in the picture he took. Leon told us that the picture shows the tracking number. So all of this is so much unnecessary drama over a typical transaction that was simply delayed in the mail.

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by robw1959

But he did provide the tracking number in the picture he took. Leon told us that the picture shows the tracking number. So all of this is so much unnecessary drama over a typical transaction that was simply delayed in the mail.

He provided that picture to Leon. No one will answer whether that was ever provided to the buyer. The fact that that question keeps being ignored is concerning. If it was ever provided, just say so. If it wasn't, just say so. All this runaround sends up red flags.

[Peter_Spaeth]

,,,

[Gorditadogg]

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5

He provided that picture to Leon. No one will answer whether that was ever provided to the buyer. The fact that that question keeps being ignored is concerning. If it was ever provided, just say so. If it wasn't, just say so. All this runaround sends up red flags.

Look at post #34, counselor. James acknowledged he got the picture.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Gorditadogg

Look at post #34, counselor. James acknowledged he got the picture.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

He acknowledged he got the picture after this thread was made. That's not what I am worried about. I want to know if a tracking number was ever provided before a thread had to be made. James claims to have asked for it and been denied. Seller (and Leon) both refuse to answer the question if it was provided previously.

Here is what James claims in post 34:

Originally Posted by jingram058

No sir. He never gave me the tracking. He kept repeating that he would provide tracking but never did.

I get that seller then provided tracking later. My problem is with this behavior of never giving the tracking, even when asked, until a thread gets made.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5

He acknowledged he got the picture after this thread was made. That's not what I am worried about. I want to know if a tracking number was ever provided before a thread had to be made. James claims to have asked for it and been denied. Seller (and Leon) both refuse to answer the question if it was provided previously.

You remind me of my dad (*RIP) when he used to say to me -

"Son, you would argue with a sign-post and give it a 30 minute head start"

Not quite sure exactly what that meant, but I don't think it was good.
.

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Leon

You remind me of my dad (*RIP) when he used to say to me -

"Son, you would argue with a sign-post and give it a 30 minute head start"

Not quite sure exactly what that meant, but I don't think it was good.
.

I'm not arguing anything. I asked a simple question and haven't gotten a simple answer. Did seller provide tracking before this thread was made? That's all I want to know. You would rather insult me than answer that question. Which is just as telling as all the other evasive answers you provided.

[Peter_Spaeth]

The People vs. Octavio.

[Gorditadogg]

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5

He acknowledged he got the picture after this thread was made. That's not what I am worried about. I want to know if a tracking number was ever provided before a thread had to be made. James claims to have asked for it and been denied. Seller (and Leon) both refuse to answer the question if it was provided previously.

Here is what James claims in post 34:



I get that seller then provided tracking later. My problem is with this behavior of never giving the tracking, even when asked, until a thread gets made.

"No one will answer whether that was ever provided to the buyer."

I think maybe you meant to ask a different question?

Personally I would not expect $15 of cards to be sent with tracking. My thinking is why would you pay $5 to ship $15 of cards, just put them in a PWE.





Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

[jingram058]

Originally Posted by Gorditadogg

"No one will answer whether that was ever provided to the buyer."

I think maybe you meant to ask a different question?

Personally I would not expect $15 of cards to be sent with tracking. My thinking is why would you pay $5 to ship $15 of cards, just put them in a PWE.





Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

Why does it keep coming back to $15?

Why do you just seem incapable of understanding that these are 1948 Bowman cards? Not cheap reprints. Please try to find 6 48 Bowman for $15 anywhere. It's the cards, not the money! Please try to be rational.

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by Gorditadogg

"No one will answer whether that was ever provided to the buyer."

I think maybe you meant to ask a different question?

Personally I would not expect $15 of cards to be sent with tracking. My thinking is why would you pay $5 to ship $15 of cards, just put them in a PWE.


Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

Depends on the cards and buyer. In this case they are cards James really likes/wants so I could see paying for the tracking/better packaging.

Plus shipping is different for everyone. Personally when selling or buying if you/I want to save a few bucks and use a PWE there is usually zero guarantee on delivery. With tracking if they do not show up I expect to be refunded or give one.

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Gorditadogg

"No one will answer whether that was ever provided to the buyer."

I think maybe you meant to ask a different question?

Personally I would not expect $15 of cards to be sent with tracking. My thinking is why would you pay $5 to ship $15 of cards, just put them in a PWE.





Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

Nope. I asked the exact question I intended. Thanks.

In discussing the events leading up to this thread, my question is was tracking ever provided, i.e. at initial shipping, or after buyer had to ask for it, or any point leading up to the creation of this thread. The allegations are that buyer asked for it several times and was refused. It's important to know if that is being denied, because that information will matter to many potential buyers.

[Keith H. Thompson]

that the mailing label is somehow difficult to read. I can tell you that if it ever gets to the "dead letter" facility in Atlanta you can say good bye.

With a genuine tracking number that can be scanned, I predict success.

I once had a package that tracking indicated had a stop at the USPS facility nearest my mailing address, but it just kept going to Florida. After a very long wait of several weeks it did arrive.

[Mark17]

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5

This has nothing to do with the point. The point is that seller appears to have not provided the tracking number.

No, the point of this 100+ post thread is that Leon is not a Wahoo, Sam Crawford was, and we miss Chief Wahoo.

[egri]

Originally Posted by Mark17

No, the point of this 100+ post thread is that Leon is not a Wahoo, Sam Crawford was, and we miss Chief Wahoo.

There was also a submarine, USS Wahoo, not named after any of the above, that had a very impressive record before it was sunk.

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5

Exactly. Seems many are missing the whole point here, when they talk about $15, or whether the cards were shipped and/or will be delivered (see below).



This has nothing to do with the point. The point is that seller appears to have not provided the tracking number. That's not ok, regardless if the cards show up.

Au contraire counselor. Taking it reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Get those paralegals into OT!


And I quote from the 1st post.

"Tracking and a photo show delivery. Well, they did not come to me"


Apparently, the OP thought the tracking shows delivery, which it did not. This could be misconstrued, but he himself wrote the above sentence. Leading to the subsequent posts. Was it a photo of the tracking number? Who can tell. However, clearly his post says they were delivered elsewhere, followed up with not to him.

I don't believe they were delivered to anyone...yet.


The jury is out

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

Au contraire counselor. Taking it reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Get those paralegals into OT!


And I quote from the 1st post.

"Tracking and a photo show delivery. Well, they did not come to me"


Apparently, the OP thought the tracking shows delivery, which it did not. This could be misconstrued, but he himself wrote the above sentence. Leading to the subsequent posts. Was it a photo of the tracking number? Who can tell. However, clearly his post says they were delivered elsewhere, followed up with not to him.

I don't believe they were delivered to anyone...yet.


The jury is out

Maybe you need to brush up on reading comprehension. Those were clearly claims seller was TELLING buyer, because buyer was quite clear in post 34 that prior to receiving the picture after making this thread, seller had not provided tracking, despite requests for it.

I love how you arrogantly attack my reading comprehension, while conveniently leaving out the part of the original post that said the seller refused to provide the tracking info or photo. :doh:

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5

Maybe you need to brush up on reading comprehension. Those were clearly claims seller was TELLING buyer, because buyer was quite clear in post 34 that prior to receiving the picture after making this thread, seller had not provided tracking, despite requests for it.

I love how you arrogantly attack my reading comprehension, while conveniently leaving out the part of the original post that said the seller refused to provide the tracking info or photo. :doh:

So according to HIS testimony... what was the photo?

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by jingram058

Seller had a nice group of cards up for sale. I responded with a PM. We agree and the money is sent. Weeks go by, no cards. I send PMs and am told, tracking and a photo show delivery. Well, they did not come to me. Seller won't send me the tracking number or the photo. So I am out the money, and no cards.

I have learned this hard lesson over and over...if it seems too good to be true, it is.

Originally Posted by jingram058

No sir. He never gave me the tracking. He kept repeating that he would provide tracking but never did.

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

So according to HIS testimony... what was the photo?

Well, if you could comprehend what you read, he was TOLD of the photo, but never provided it.

[Peter_Spaeth]

It's 1815 all over again.