BST etiquette am I wrong

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by jayshum

I would probably tell them that someone else is offering to buy it and they need to make a decision if they're going to or not. It gets back to the discussion in the other thread about etiquette. I don't see a problem with the first person expressing interest getting priority even if they didn't commit to buying right away. Again, like at a show, if someone is looking at a card, someone else isn't going to be able to buy it until the first person puts it down and says no.

Again, how is "I'll take it" not a commitment? What more was Jonathan supposed to do other than cancel all his plans for the day in order to hang by his computer or iphone anxiously awaiting Cody's next message? You are making this endlessly complicated for some reason, I just don't see it.

[John1941]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

This isn't a place for privacy. I mean we all are stamped here in many ways. Names, personal phone numbers, emails what's collected etc etc.

News to me that everyone here can see my full name, phone number, and email. Leon knows my phone number and people I've bought and sold with know my full name and address. And that's it.

As others have said, one miscommunication doth not a fundamental problem make. Most of my experiences on BST have been pretty simple - communications by DM have been limited to giving paypal information and address or discussion of shared collecting interests. Not sure what purpose it would serve to make people have to share that for everyone to see.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Again, how is "I'll take it" not a commitment? What more was Jonathan supposed to do other than cancel all his plans for the day in order to hang by his computer or iphone?

Sorry, my post you responded to wasn't clear. I meant I would tell the first person I was talking to that they needed to decide if they wanted the card because someone else was offering to buy it.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by jayshum

Sorry, my post you responded to wasn't clear. I meant I would tell the first person I was talking to that they needed to decide if they wanted the card because someone else was offering to buy it.

I would tell the first person someone had taken it and I would get back to them if it fell through. Your response basically just blows off the I'll take it and renders it meaningless. Fine, if you think this is just contract law.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I would tell the first person someone had taken it and I would get back to them if it fell through. Your response basically just blows off the I'll take it and renders it meaningless. Fine, if you think this is just contract law.

I think it's fairer to the first person who contacted me about it and is more like what would happen in person. Fortunately (and unfortunately), just about everything I have sold on here has not been in such high demand that I've had to deal with an issue like this.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I would tell the first person someone had taken it and I would get back to them if it fell through. Your response basically just blows off the I'll take it and renders it meaningless. Fine, if you think this is just contract law.

Are there limits to the plenipotentiary powers of the phrase “I’ll take it”?

What if it was someone you didn’t trust or had burned you before? Or someone who was new around here? Or if it was me?! It just seems like there has to be some limits to just how powerful the phrase can be.

[Carter08]

Lots of threads make me question what people spend their time on -
this one is special in that regard. I am guilty too for following it. I think a summary of this major issue is a seller posted something for sale, a buyer may or may not have said he’d take it but someone else paid the seller first and got it. Devil is in the details but overall get over it.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by raulus

Go ahead and draft up the rules that you think should apply to the BST. And then lobby Leon to make them the law of the BST.

I wish you the best of luck!

Actually, I asked Leon directly today.His response was to post in both. That's the issue I see in this. Some post in one or the other not in both. Leon says you should.

What's so bad about keeping it in one place vs multiple?

I'd say the person that ended up with this is staying quite, because he doesn't want to be involved in this thread. Not because people know what he paid for said item.

How easy would it be for both parties if it was done in the BST post vs having both places that is causing issues. Maybe it will get more frequent,maybe it won't.

What I do know is if it's given one place it won't hurt the BST at all. People will still buy, and sell, and it will be done in order so no one can feel slighted. It protects both parties, and the others behind the initial winner if it breaks down. If you don't want people to know who you are get a burner account for BST.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by jayshum

I think it's fairer to the first person who contacted me about it and is more like what would happen in person. Fortunately (and unfortunately), just about everything I have sold on here has not been in such high demand that I've had to deal with an issue like this.

I hear you on that I'm lucky to get one lowballing person contact me half the time haha.

I could be wrong but I think most people would give precedence to the first I'll take it and not give the first contact a right of first refusal at that point.

[Carter08]

If anything the seller is guilty of offering something for sale at a more than reasonable price where a bunch of people wanted it. A rarity here.

[Jewish-collector]

There's nothing better in life when a Net54 member has an issue with another Net54 member and that other Net54 member comes on here to explain their side. Oh hell yeah.
beer chug.gifbeer chug.gifbeer chug.gifbeer chug.gifbeer chug.gif

[brunswickreeves]

This is how BST typically works well (I’m not a lawyer, nor play one on TV, so this is not legal advice, and all are welcome to correct any errors or omissions):

1. Seller posts card, description, price, and statement: ‘I’ll take it’ supersedes all ongoing discussions (there’s good reason some post this disclaimer).
2. Potential Buyer posts reply to listing or PMs Seller: ‘I’ll take it.’
3. Seller PMs the potential Buyer either that a sale is already pending and thus their ‘I’ll take it’ is unfortunately declined, or the payment method details if they’re 1st in queue, asks Buyer to make payment in a specified time period to lock in the deal, as well as asks for Buyer’s email, shipping carrier preference, and address. Good faith assumption is made by Seller that payment will be made by the potential Buyer from their ‘I’ll take it’ post, regardless of whether or not they hear back from potential Buyer before #5 below. Potential Buyer makes good faith assumption they will be sold the card if Seller responds to them and doesn’t explicitly decline their ‘I’ll take it’ reply.
4. Potential Buyer PMs the Seller asap with requested info from #3 and notes when payment will be made and cleared.
5. Seller replies ‘Sale Pending’ to their listing. Anyone else in BST replying they’ll take it, or on any other platform tries to claim it takes their respective place in the potential Buyer queue.
6. Potential Buyer makes payment and once cleared becomes the rightful owner by transfer of their property (money) for Seller’s property (advertised card).
7. Seller confirms Buyer’s payment clears their bank, completing part 1 in the transfer of property. Then replies ‘Sold’ to their listing.
8. Buyer PMs the Seller their email, shipping carrier preference, and address to Seller.
9. Seller emails pics of the card to the Buyer in current state and time stamped, pics in its secured packaging, then ships the card to Buyer. Seller then PMs and/or emails the shipping tracking info to the Buyer. Both monitor shipping status and keep lines of communication open as needed.
10. Card arrives to Buyer and part 2 in the transfer of property is complete.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by John1941

News to me that everyone here can see my full name, phone number, and email. Leon knows my phone number and people I've bought and sold with know my full name and address. And that's it.

As others have said, one miscommunication doth not a fundamental problem make. Most of my experiences on BST have been pretty simple - communications by DM have been limited to giving paypal information and address or discussion of shared collecting interests. Not sure what purpose it would serve to make people have to share that for everyone to see.

Well John, if you ever post in certain posts, you will be made to reveal your full name by board rules. I can get your contact information with one click. If I'm interested or you are in BST I have everything. If you don't think your information can't be breached here you may want to buy my ocean front property in Missouri.

[G1911]

On the conceptual issue, I have never had a real issue in any forum's BST and it's not difficult. Transactions have been smooth and easy almost every single time I've sold on a forum from giving away cheap stuff for free to ~$10K deals. If I'm worried about it I do, adapted from my 'get-out-of-jail-free' clause from another hobby where discretion is more important, throw in a line at the end that I reserve the right to decline to do business with any person for any reason or no reason, so that I don't have to be 'obligated' to deal with someone who I am suspicious is going to try and make an issue or I suspect is going to be needlessly difficult. Whether one sells to the first "I will take it" or to the first responder who wants to talk about it, both are reasonable and not worth great thought or hand wringing. It is really not difficult to do basic transactions without drama. Although the dramatic meltdowns and frivolous imaginary lawsuits is a lot of fun when I'm not in the transaction.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by brunswickreeves

This is how BST typically works well (I’m not a lawyer, nor play one on TV, so this is not legal advice, and all are welcome to correct any errors or omissions):

1. Seller posts card, description, price, and statement: ‘I’ll take it’ supersedes all ongoing discussions (there’s good reason some post this disclaimer).
2. Potential Buyer posts reply to listing: ‘I’ll take it.’
3. Seller PMs the potential Buyer either that a sale is already pending and thus their ‘I’ll take it’ is unfortunately declined, or the payment method details if they’re 1st in queue, asks Buyer to make payment in a specified time period to lock in the deal, as well as asks for Buyer’s email, shipping carrier preference, and address. Good faith assumption is made by Seller that payment will be made by the potential Buyer from their ‘I’ll take it’ post, regardless of whether or not they hear back from potential Buyer before #5 below. Potential Buyer makes good faith assumption they will be sold the card if Seller responds to them and doesn’t explicitly decline their ‘I’ll take it’ reply.
4. Potential Buyer PMs the Seller asap with requested info from #3 and notes when payment will be made and cleared.
5. Seller replies ‘Sale Pending’ to their listing. Anyone else in BST replying they’ll take it, or on any other platform tries to claim it takes their respective place in the potential Buyer queue.
6. Potential Buyer makes payment and once cleared becomes the rightful owner by transfer of their property (money) for Seller’s property (advertised card).
7. Seller confirms Buyer’s payment clears their bank, completing part 1 in the transfer of property. Then replies ‘Sold’ to their listing.
8. Buyer PMs the Seller their email, shipping carrier preference, and address to Seller.
9. Seller emails pics of the card to the Buyer in current state and time stamped, pics in its secured packaging, then ships the card to Buyer. Seller then PMs and/or emails the shipping tracking info to the Buyer. Both monitor shipping status and keep lines of communication open as needed.
10. Card arrives to Buyer and part 2 in the transfer of property is complete.

I would estimate that well over 95% of the sales I've made have not had someone post "I'll take it" on the thread. The vast majority have just been someone sending me a PM indicating they wanted to buy something.

[John1941]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

Well John, if you ever post in certain posts, you will be made to reveal your full name by board rules. I can get your contact information with one click. If I'm interested or you are in BST I have everything. If you don't think your information can't be breached here you may want to buy my ocean front property in Missouri.

Well, in three years and nearly 500 posts I've never made any posts that necessitate my full name.

I may be wrong, but I don't see how you can find my personal information thru Net54 with one click.

And I'm not paranoid about being breached - I just don't think that buying/selling on the BST should require me to share with everyone my address, paypal, etc. which your plan requires unless I'm mistaken.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by John1941

Well, in three years and nearly 500 posts I've never made any posts that necessitate my full name.

I may be wrong, but I don't see how you can find my personal information thru Net54 with one click.

And I'm not paranoid about being breached - I just don't think that buying/selling on the BST should require me to share with everyone my address, paypal, etc. which your plan requires unless I'm mistaken.

John, I think he is saying that if your full name and a location are listed for you, it's not too hard to find an address and phone number for someone through various online sites. It's not that all of your information is available through net54.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by John1941

Well, in three years and nearly 500 posts I've never made any posts that necessitate my full name.

I may be wrong, but I don't see how you can find my personal information thru Net54 with one click.

And I'm not paranoid about being breached - I just don't think that buying/selling on the BST should require me to share with everyone my address, paypal, etc. which your plan requires unless I'm mistaken.

If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. I just did a quick search on your posts, and you should have been made to post your full name "New COMC Issues?" was one that you needed to have your full name to post in.

[John1941]

Originally Posted by jayshum

John, I think he is saying that if your full name and a location are listed for you, it's not too hard to find an address and phone number for someone through various online sites. It's not that all of your information is available through net54.

That makes sense but isn't really applicable for me as I don't have my full name listed here, and as a somewhat retiring high schooler I haven't populated the internet with my information yet. (And I just googled to make sure LOL.)

[John1941]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it.

Yes. I know that. And I've never written anything concerning a person or company and don't plan on doing so either. And not because I'd be freaked out about people knowing my last name - I just don't have anything to say concerning people or companies.

This conversation probably isn't worth the bother but it's a nice break from number crunching for fantasy baseball prep.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by jayshum

John, I think he is saying that if your full name and a location are listed for you, it's not too hard to find an address and phone number for someone through various online sites. It's not that all of your information is available through net54.

Correct. Thanks. Many of us have posted things that come up from here on a simple Google search. Along with much information as well.

This place is for sharing. "Privacy" is not belonging to social media, which this is a form of.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by John1941

That makes sense but isn't really applicable for me as I don't have my full name listed here, and as a somewhat retiring high schooler I haven't populated the internet with my information yet. (And I just googled to make sure LOL.)

John, it's good to know there are some younger collectors on the board. Someone has to be around to buy all of the stuff we older guys have some day.

It is definitely hard to stay anonymous online, especially as you get older. There are just too many things that end up having to be done online (or are just so much more convenient and easy to do online) that eventually, some amount of personal information becomes available.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by John1941

Yes. I know that. And I've never written anything concerning a person or company and don't plan on doing so either. And not because I'd be freaked out about people knowing my last name - I just don't have anything to say concerning people or companies.

This conversation probably isn't worth the bother but it's a nice break from number crunching for fantasy baseball prep.

"New COMC Issues?" Was the first I found from your posts, and I stopped. You also posted about a person passing, but didn't care to see who. I can go back farther if you would like? Not trying to bust your balls, but yes you have posted in both. You got passed Leon. Consider yourself lucky.

John1941 net54 try a Google search. Everything you posted in will show up.

I screen shot a few things for you.

Screenshot_20250301_212910_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20250301_212955_Chrome.jpg

[John1941]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

"New COMC Issues?" Was the first I found from your posts, and I stopped. You also posted about a person passing, but didn't care to see who. I can go back farther if you would like? Not trying to bust your balls, but yes you have posted in both. You got passed Leon. Consider yourself lucky.

If you read the FAQ carefully, you'll see that Leon says you can't remain anonymous if you want to criticize or accuse a person or company. You can discuss a person or company anonymously as long as you're not ghost-attacking them. My post in "New COMC issues" was about how I liked buying from COMC despite their shipping issues - praise, not criticism. And as far as I know, I've never criticized or accused anyone... though who knows, maybe if you look carefully enough through all my posts, you'll find something.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

"New COMC Issues?" Was the first I found from your posts, and I stopped. You also posted about a person passing, but didn't care to see who. I can go back farther if you would like? Not trying to bust your balls, but yes you have posted in both. You got passed Leon. Consider yourself lucky.

John1941 net54 try a Google search. Everything you posted in will show up.

I screen shot a few things for you.

Attachment 653199

Attachment 653200

You don't need to do a Google search to find all the posts someone made on net54. Just click on their username to go to their Profile page, click on the Statistics tab and you'll see a link for Find all posts by xxxx

Actually, it's even easier than that. Just click on their username and a window pops up that gives you the option to Find all posts by xxxx

[Fred]

Originally Posted by John1941

If you read the FAQ, you'll see that Leon says you can't remain anonymous if you want to criticize or accuse a person or company. You can discuss a person or company anonymously as long as you're not ghost-attacking them. My post in "New COMC issues" was about how I liked buying from COMC despite their shipping issues - praise, not criticism. And as far as I know, I've never criticized or accused anyone... though who knows, maybe if you look carefully enough through all my posts, you'll find something.

Is the letter "I" even the real first letter of your last name?


Theme to Perry Mason - if you don't know what that is, then don't bother playing it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpdQ0kRC5dk
.
.
.
.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by jayshum

You don't need to do a Google search to find all the posts someone made on net54. Just click on their username to go to their Profile page, click on the Statistics tab and you'll see a link for Find all posts by xxxx

Actually, it's even easier than that. Just click on their username and a window pops up that gives you the option to Find all posts by xxxx

I'm showing him how anyone can find his info. Not just here. I know how to do so here.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by John1941

If you read the FAQ carefully, you'll see that Leon says you can't remain anonymous if you want to criticize or accuse a person or company. You can discuss a person or company anonymously as long as you're not ghost-attacking them. My post in "New COMC issues" was about how I liked buying from COMC despite their shipping issues - praise, not criticism. And as far as I know, I've never criticized or accused anyone... though who knows, maybe if you look carefully enough through all my posts, you'll find something.

This bolded in the header at the top of the page, and it say quote:

If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

Actually, I asked Leon directly today.His response was to post in both. That's the issue I see in this. Some post in one or the other not in both. Leon says you should.

What's so bad about keeping it in one place vs multiple?

I'd say the person that ended up with this is staying quite, because he doesn't want to be involved in this thread. Not because people know what he paid for said item.

How easy would it be for both parties if it was done in the BST post vs having both places that is causing issues. Maybe it will get more frequent,maybe it won't.

What I do know is if it's given one place it won't hurt the BST at all. People will still buy, and sell, and it will be done in order so no one can feel slighted. It protects both parties, and the others behind the initial winner if it breaks down. If you don't want people to know who you are get a burner account for BST.

Cool. Good luck with enforcing those rules.

But when it comes to burner accounts, those are definitely not allowed around here under the existing rules, and will even get you banned PDQ. So that solution is DOA.

[John1941]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

I'm showing him how anyone can find his info. Not just here. I know how to do so here.

Um, but you're not showing me how anyone can find my info, you're just showing how people can find my posts on Net54. Anyone is welcome to read my posts from here

[John1941]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

This bolded in the header at the top of the page, and it say quote:

If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it.

Which is just a quick and dirty formulation of what the FAQ states comprehensively. A summary of something doesn't supersede the full/rigorous formulation. The FAQ makes clear that it's only anonymous negative statements about a person or company that are verboten.

Here:
"Anonymous, where this board is concerned, implies that you are not known to the moderator or anyone else. That is not permitted on Net54baseball. However, you may remain private on the board; otherwise, as long your post is not argumentative, controversial, confrontational, accusatorial etc.…For example you can discuss attributes of cards, sets or memorabilia and stay private. You can not say someone is an imbecile, hard to deal with, gave poor service etc…and remain private on the board. In addition to that if your opinion is that you dislike someone, hate them, can’t stand or don’t like anything about them, and you want to tell the world about it on Net54baseball, then your full name will need to be in your post."

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by John1941

Um, but you're not showing me how anyone can find my info, you're just showing how people can find my posts on Net54. Anyone is welcome to read my posts from here

I just showed you how.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by John1941

Which is just a quick and dirty formulation of what the FAQ states comprehensively. A summary of something doesn't supersede the full/rigorous formulation. The FAQ makes clear that it's only anonymous negative statements about a person or company that are verboten.

Here:
"Anonymous, where this board is concerned, implies that you are not known to the moderator or anyone else. That is not permitted on Net54baseball. However, you may remain private on the board; otherwise, as long your post is not argumentative, controversial, confrontational, accusatorial etc.…For example you can discuss attributes of cards, sets or memorabilia and stay private. You can not say someone is an imbecile, hard to deal with, gave poor service etc…and remain private on the board. In addition to that if your opinion is that you dislike someone, hate them, can’t stand or don’t like anything about them, and you want to tell the world about it on Net54baseball, then your full name will need to be in your post."

Well, Leon may say differently. Ask me how I know.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

I just showed you how.

You didn't find any personal information about him.

[John1941]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. I just did a quick search on your posts, and you should have been made to post your full name "New COMC Issues?" was one that you needed to have your full name to post in.

I find it creepy for you to substantially rewrite your posts in edit after a good chunk of time has passed. When you originally posted this there was nothing about my post in "New COMC issues." (What I quoted in post #170 is your original post in its entirety.)

Chad, if it's so easy to know everything about me, what is my last name exactly?

And if you can't tell me my name in three days you'll have to give me your first-born child. Rumplestiltskin rules.

[G1911]

Vintage Vern, who had an over the top tantrum similar to the OP of this thread because he didn't get a card he wanted just recently, trying to redesign the B/S/T, scold John who is a great guy and more mature than most of us adults and doesn't make controversial posts, over forum rules and trying to track him online to find his address and last name to prove a tiny point nobody cares about is just the cherry on top to this thread. Hilarious.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by jayshum

You didn't find any personal information about him.

Sure I did. His name, and location. I did it on my wife's phone. I could find it with photos as well as the blog he belongs to if I wanted to sign up to see his full account. Not knowing what he had to show to write there. That's not important just a perk. I can pay what 19 bucks, and pretty much show up on a door step. I might not even need that. A guy at work couldn't believe how easy I found his parents and sister without much info at all. Trust me it's not hard. We all can be found, that's the point.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by John1941

I find it creepy for you to substantially rewrite your posts in edit after a good chunk of time has passed. When you originally posted this there was nothing about my post in "New COMC issues." (What I quoted in post #170 is your original post in its entirety.)

Chad, if it's so easy to know everything about me, what is my last name exactly?

And if you can't tell me my name in three days you'll have to give me your first-born child. Rumplestiltskin rules.

Do you understand when you post your full name, it will take me 20 minutes. See most of us have to. You by board rules should as well. You're lucky so far flying under the radar not that I care. I'm pointing that out to you.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by G1911

Vintage Vern, who had an over the top tantrum similar to the OP of this thread because he didn't get a card he wanted just recently, trying to redesign the B/S/T, scold John who is a great guy and more mature than most of us adults and doesn't make controversial posts, over forum rules and trying to track him online to find his address and last name to prove a tiny point nobody cares about is just the cherry on top to this thread. Hilarious.

Nice redirect, and phantom crying on a tantrum that didn't happen on my end, just one you created in your own tiny brain if we can call it that, and couldn'tlet it go. Talk about maturity, and a bug up your ass. Your above post shows just how easy your misrepresentation of facts don't stop your stupidity.


LOL, yes I'm scolding a person by pointing out how easy it is for us on this private site to be worried about publicly stating "I want it" vs doing so by DM.
You caught the Tater!

I hate to break it to you, but board rules are for all, and even the great guys have to follow them.

[John1941]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

Sure I did. His name, and location. I did it on my wife's phone. I could find it with photos as well as the blog he belongs to if I wanted to sign up to see his full account. Not knowing what he had to show to write there. That's not important just a perk. I can pay what 19 bucks, and pretty much show up on a door step. I might not even need that. A guy at work couldn't believe how easy I found his parents and sister without much info at all. Trust me it's not hard.

Do you understand how creepy you're being?

Also, I have no idea what you're talking about with "signing up to see my full account" and paying 19 bucks.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

Sure I did. His name, and location. I did it on my wife's phone. I could find it with photos as well as the blog he belongs to if I wanted to sign up to see his full account. Not knowing what he had to show to write there. That's not important just a perk. I can pay what 19 bucks, and pretty much show up on a door step. I might not even need that. A guy at work couldn't believe how easy I found his parents and sister without much info at all. Trust me it's not hard.

I'm not sure what you're talking about now. Are you saying that by Googling his net54 username and listed location (Texas), you were able to find his full name and address? All you posted were a few of his net54 threads.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

Nice redirect, and phantom crying on a tantrum that didn't happen on my end, just one you created in your own tiny brain if we can call it that, and couldn'tlet it go. Talk about maturity, and a bug up your ass. Your above post shows just how easy your misrepresentation of facts don't stop your stupidity.


LOL, yes I'm scolding a person by pointing out how easy it is for us on this private site to be worried about publicly stating "I want it" vs doing so by DM.
You caught the Tater!

I hate to break it to you, but board rules are for all, and even the great guys have to follow them.

Mhm. You realize you are currently estalking a minor across the web to get his personally identifying information and location, right? I think that should be against the board rules (you'd think it wouldn't even need to be a formal rule!). Can we ban this guy for being a creep?

[John1941]

Originally Posted by jayshum

I'm not sure what you're talking about now. Are you saying that by Googling his net54 username and listed location (Texas), you were able to find his full name and address? All you posted were a few of his net54 threads.

Turns out I'm John Rice Carter (1941-). Busted.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

Do you understand when you post your full name, it will take me 20 minutes. See most of us have to. You by board rules should as well. You're lucky so far flying under the radar not that I care. I'm pointing that out to you.

If you think someone is not following the rules of the board, report it to Leon. It's not your job to tell someone directly because it's not your opinion that matters.

[NiceDocter]

I will take it

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by jayshum

I'm not sure what you're talking about now. Are you saying that by Googling his net54 username and listed location (Texas), you were able to find his full name and address? All you posted were a few of his net54 threads.

I'm saying this isn't some private haven. It started because some tried to make it a point people don't want to publicly state I'll take it in the BST forum which is actually protected outside of members if I'm not mistaken unlike the main board.

That's the reasoning behind wanting to use the DM vs the original post in BST to buy items, and how many want to stay incognito.

I was then linked a post Showing your collections/room off to others by if im not mistaken John. which was kind of funny. It pops up on Google, and so did everyone and everything posted. Even the people that wouldn't show people, just actually showed people. If your name, and location are on your posts along with your bio, what you collect, what your looking for, who you've had the pleasure of buying or selling to, and from.

Yes, we can be found out easily from people not even here on the board. I didn’t look for John, I said I could if that was my want, and desire. Its not, but many of us aren't hard to gather info on to those that want to.

John's last name isn't at this time listed, but a simple board search shows he's dodged the bullet so far, because the email I received has exactly what I posted, and what is bolded at the top of each page.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by G1911

Mhm. You realize you are currently estalking a minor across the web to get his personally identifying information and location, right? I think that should be against the board rules (you'd think it wouldn't even need to be a formal rule!). Can we ban this guy for being a creep?

You must know a lot about this minor. Maybe we need to turn the attention to you? I think you may be listed as someone more than a creep.

[Vintage Vern]

Originally Posted by jayshum

If you think someone is not following the rules of the board, report it to Leon. It's not your job to tell someone directly because it's not your opinion that matters.

Leon will do it on his own. Do you see my full name? Guess who and why! I don't care. I was pointing it out because John said he didn't have his full name. He has done nothing more then I did to have to have my full name required. That's all. That was brought up to point out it's required once you do what the bold states for board policy. That lead to if your full name and place of residence its not hard to pull off how to get to the goods.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Vintage Vern

You must know a lot about this minor. Maybe we need to turn the attention to you? I think you may be listed as someone more than a creep.

You are literally estalking a kid and describing your process in this thread tonight. It's really funny, but seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you lol

[PhillyFan1883]

This thread has it all. Baseless lawsuits, last word freaks, estalking and everything in between. My bag of popcorn is empty, but the thread just keeps on giving.


IMO this is how every card deal should go down for some comic relief. In super serious times of dodging bullets and very serious lawsuits.

https://www.tiktok.com/@altxyzoffici...31260587412778