![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
People would demand the reholdering for free as Mechanical Errors, I bet.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe, but how many cards are we talking about? These are as scarce as hen's teeth.
__________________
"You start a conversation, you can't even finish it You're talking a lot, but you're not saying anything When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed Say something once, why say it again?" If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Free insured shipping both ways as well, but it's about the precedent. If they change this set, then why won't they change other sets?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, I believe one could argue that the re-holder would not be caused by a "mechanical error" but rather a hobby correction, thereby making it debatable as to who should pay the cost. As for precedent, I note that for years Mendelsohn's m101-5 set was labeled by the graders as a 1915 issue when it in fact came out the following year, and now you would be hard-pressed to find many slabs still stating 1915. The same can be said for the e135 Collins- McCarthy set, for years incorrectly labeled as a 1916 issue rather than the true 1917 date-- most all have been corrected and/or at least the date of newly submitted cards is now correct. Somehow PSA managed to endure whatever costs were necessary to get it right. I don't see correcting these things as causing major hobby upheaval, and I am unaware of widespread mis-dating.
__________________
"You start a conversation, you can't even finish it You're talking a lot, but you're not saying anything When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed Say something once, why say it again?" If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. Last edited by nolemmings; 02-23-2025 at 03:51 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New to the hobby 1961 Topps Dice cards Mantle Highest Graded! | whiteymet | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 38 | 03-29-2023 05:19 PM |
Offers being accepted for 1961 Topps Dice Cards | whiteymet | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-10-2023 11:03 PM |
Did I just discover that the Topps Dice Game cards are from 1963 instead of 1961? | frankhardy | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 03-07-2019 11:25 AM |
1961 topps dice game | sflayank | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 11 | 06-30-2016 12:17 PM |
1961 topps dice game | sflayank | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 11-10-2010 03:27 PM |