![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don't know that I'm any "expert" but I'd guess he did at least little light rubbing or dabbing on that area.
__________________
. || || \/ If you want a deal, you might not get a card. If you want a card, you might not get a deal. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That would be my non-expert guess as well.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
yep, he did... very light. released dirt and a few extra letters here and there.
__________________
************************************************** *********** Jeff "Belfast1933" - honoring my dad, Belfast Maine and Right Fielder for the mighty East Side Rinky Dinks https://grossvintagebaseball.com/ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This was one of those times where you should have left it alone.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I said that in post 16 and was rebuked.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 02-19-2025 at 06:00 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes you were unnecessarily shamed repeatedly for suggesting it. Was not too hard to see the outcome. Well on the bright side at least it was not a Jackson.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OP was obviously too trigger-happy to soak that card without trying his hand on something else as was suggested, but it's his card and he says he's fine with the damage, so that's that.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter, how many Cracker Jacks have you held under a black light to see if they fluoresce?
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Back in the late 80s, when I got back into cards, blacklights and loupes weren't in wide use at all. Now I have both, and have examined all my pre-war. If any are indeed fake, they're so good I can't tell. Good enough for me.
__________________
James Ingram Successful net54 purchases from/trades with: Tere1071 (twice), Bocabirdman (5 times), 8thEastVB, GoldenAge50s, IronHorse2130, Kris19 (twice), G1911, dacubfan, sflayank, Smanzari, bocca001, eliminator, ejstel, lampertb, rjackson44 (twice), Jason19th, Cmvorce, CobbSpikedMe, Harliduck, donmuth, HercDriver, Huck, theshleps, horzverti, ALBB, lrush |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At least 17 but I will have to check my notes.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1914 Cracker Jack Vs 1915 Cracker Jack single | Bryzz02016 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-17-2024 06:05 PM |
Cracker Jack 1915 - Jack #162 George Stallings Boston SGC 96 MINT 9 | hedgefund96 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-27-2018 04:40 AM |
1914 Cracker Jack Adams, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Toole | Brian Van Horn | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 02-01-2012 07:19 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Lord, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Neill | Brian Van Horn | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2011 05:22 PM |
1915 Cracker Jack Doolan, 1915 M101-5 Konetchy | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 06-09-2007 10:29 AM |