![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I found this miscut Dennis Bennett in eBay's sold items, it looks like the red of a Dodger/Yankee but there aren't any of those really available. It would make sense if it is orange and it is Hoyt Wilhelm above him.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My first guess would be a White Sox/Cub, but like you say it could also be Dodger/Yankee.
Notice the reverse miscut...not a sliver of the salmon color, yet the full right edge of the black border and, I think, clear specks of white indicating we're seeing the full thickness and it is one of the thinner borders. I went through all available (to my counting) Dodgers/Yankees AND White Sox Cubs, and could find no card that had the offset of the salmon from the black to this degree, to include Wilhelm which shows a slight offset. Then I went through ALL the Yankees/Dodgers and Cubs/White Sox just for kicks - it could only be two. The first is Don Buford, but he is safely ensconced elsewhere. The other is Steve Hamilton, but I don't think there is any way any of us think we could have messed up the right edge so badly. What if we expanded a bit - is there any chance the card above Bennett could be, like Bennett, a pink Red Sox or Pirate? Because Bob Bailey would fit that reverse miscut perfectly, IMHO. With the color issues observed on a couple of those Aaron's I posted a couple weeks ago, can it be out of the question? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I sincerely hope that it is a color shift, and that Bennett is below Wilhelm (which is where I tentatively placed him). Otherwise, I have to blow up everything about this layout and start again from scratch. LOL
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That would be perfect - but all the copies of Wilhelm I have seen don't have what seems to be this great an offset between salmon and black.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bailey has a pirate or red sox above him, so I don't think it's Bailey.
If the yellow is shifted upward, that violet or pink color eould be observed, so i think it's Wilhelm. And i have seen examples, not only of Wilhelm, but other cub or white sox, with such a shift, and the the violet/pink is evident. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If not for the Indian/Phillie being above Steve Barber we would be down to a few 3x cards, Bearnarth, Cardenal, and Pirates Rookie Stars. I wish I didn’t find that Barber miscut
![]()
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cliff - the sweetest fruit is not always the easiest to pick. lol
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
1966_486_color_shift.jpg |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Larry Bearnarth is above George Banks. Banks is above Lenny Green. Now if we only knew who is above Bearnarth and under Green...
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think I might have found who is above Larry Bearnarth but it isn't who I was expecting, Eddie Stanky. ETA it can't be Bobby Bragan because it is a regular player card under Stanky.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-14-2025 at 04:18 PM. Reason: Addition |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
These were already pretty much confirmed but I don't think we had good scans of them, Cubs Rookie Stars above Tony Gonzalez and Joe Moeller above Cubs Rookie Stars.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I may need to step away for a while and start from scratch. Is there any way the card under Woodeshick might NOT be a yellow? Perhaps a light green of the Orioles or Astros? When you blow the image up, the card underneath looks less obviously yellow.
Here's why I ask - this Klippstein clearly has a yellow underneath him, right? I am far less along than Cliff or Kevvy because on the spreadsheet I keep I only use actual known miscuts - I haven't gotten to filling in gaps based upon card counts, etc. When I looked again at the Klippstein (who I have in a column with Blefary, Wyatt, Cannizzaro, Belinsky and John) and tried to match it with another yellow not yet assigned to ANY partial column, my two choices were Woodeshick and McAuliffe. I knew it couldn't be Woodeshick because with a yellow beneath him there couldn't be 2 yellows in that completed column. So it HAD to be McAuliffe. But one of the only horizontal miscuts we have is McAuliffe on the same row as Klippstein! So again - could the card beneath Woodeshick be a light green? If so, Blefary would match and I can sleep tonight. Last edited by deweyinthehall; 02-14-2025 at 06:33 PM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm glad you showed that miscut of Klippstein. I had forgotten about it so I looked at mine and I also have a scan of the back, it shows two lines of the stats that extend toward the left. I compared it to the back of a Tommy John and it's a perfect match. I think that confirms Tommy John under Johnny Klippstein. We have Klippstein in the 4x Gonzalez row so that means there has to be a 4x under Klippstein, which John is and John has a Twin/Red above him from the miscut. The row structure goes
4x Aaron 3x Moeller 3x Cubs Rookie Stars 4x Gonzalez 4x Nuxhall 3x Fox 3x Skinner
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is Bearnarth - the distinctive gap between the black border and the left upper corner of the color band is consistent with his cards.
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 02-14-2025 at 06:58 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |