![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know the specific rows that column 11 is in but that pattern and the order of the seven cards is correct. So if we accept that Hamilton is a 4X then he must be in either the Aaron row , the Gonzales row , or the nuxhall row.
So depending upon where Hamilton goes determines which cards are 4x and which cards are 3x. So we can cycle through and figure out where to put Hamilton so that you can determine the proper 4X cards. It may be that Hamilton is in the nuxhall row, which would make giants rs and carreon 4x and the other 4 cards 3x. Last edited by Kevvyg1026; 02-07-2025 at 11:11 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hard to see why Giants Rookies would have demand, but whatever the cause because we know it sits at the top of a slit, along with either Aaron or Gonzalez, it has to be the 4x, no?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have vertical miscuts supporting the vertical column:
Giants RS-Checklist (check 7) and Edwards-Carreon Carreon-Hamilton Hamilton-Check6 Check 6-J Wood J Wood-Giants RS I haven't seen anything tying Edwards to a checklist, but it must be in the location noted, unless there is/are a row switch (which we haven't seen yet). I agree that it's hard to fathom why Carreon might be a 4x, but I can't explain why the quantities on ebay are what they are. All I'm trying to communicate is that, with no row changes, and Hamilton being a 4x (which we all seem to accept), then Hamilton must be in either the Aaron row, Gonzalez row, or Nuxhall row. If Hamilton is in the Aaron row, then Giants RS and check 7 are 4x. If Hamilton is in the Gonzalez row, then the 4x cards must be the two checklists. And if Hamilton is in the Nuxhall row, then the 4x cards are Carreon and Giants RS. Each of those choices have drawbacks, but IMO, Hamilton being in the Nuxhall row is the least noxious, and therefore, the most appealing |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are there any horizontal miscuts related to the 7 left edge cards?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Latman to the left of Carreon as ID'd by Cliff recently.
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 02-07-2025 at 02:34 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I have that. But I don't have any for the leading edge cards like Aaron, Skinner, Cubs RS, etc.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |