![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can someone re-post the Coleman miscut with a RC to its right? I can't seem to find it.
Also, this is the pattern I came up with for both LE and RE cards. That means check7 is a 4x. LE RE A Aaron Hamilton B Moeller Check 6 C Cubs RS J. Wood D Gonzalez Giants RS E Nuxhall Check 7 F Fox Edwards G Skinner Carreon And here is a long forgotten mc of check 7, below what once was thought to be a TC, but now, is most like the Giants RS card. 1966topps517whitesox_below Giants RS.jpg Last edited by Kevvyg1026; 02-07-2025 at 06:29 AM. Reason: typo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The slit pattern I used, under the assumption that NO row changes occurred (since we haven't observed any) is as follows:
Slit A; ABCDEFGABCDE Slit B: DEFGABCDEFGA This puts Aaron at both the top of a slit and the bottom of a slit (evidence supports that) and also puts Gonzalez at the top of one slit with Nuxhall at the bottom of the other. 1966_500_BE_+Mk.jpg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't think I've seen that Coleman with a rookie stars next door. That would be good to see.
With your LE/RE comparison above, you have Moeller with the 6th series checklist - Moeller seems clearly a 3x and the checklist a 4x, no? And Gonzalez seems to be a 4x while Giants R's is a 3x - maybe switch those? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have evidence (miscuts) that show:
1. check 6 (Moeller row) is under Hamilton. 2. check 6 over Wood 3. Wood over Giants RS 4. Giants RS over check 7 5. Edwards over carreon 6. Carreon over Hamilton In a very early post, there was a mc posted showing Fox below, ostensibly, the Cubs RS, which would suppport a row change. However, I think that mc was incorrectly identified and is simply a small portion of Nuxhall. CubsRS_Fpx.jpg 1966_483_472_V_fox - nuxhall 1 (1).jpg |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You were the one who came up with the Red Sox Rookies being to the right of Coleman in post #160. It is definitely a Rookie Stars card. On top of that Red Sox Rookies has a Rookie Stars card to the right of it.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My mind is turning to mush on this subject lately - I checked and this is even listed as a match on the spreadsheet I've been pouring over lately!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |