 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
02-05-2025, 11:46 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I feel bad for OP, but it seems like his collection was large and unorganized, and very esoteric. I can see what was 'cherry-picking' to him being Leland's/Clean Sweep deciding much of it wasn't saleable. As for the contract, I hope there is more to it than what is being shown, because the picture in the first post looks like it was written on the back of a napkin, and the Net54 Bar Association can't even agree on what very basic tenents of it mean.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Leland's and Clean Sweep merging. | edhans | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-06-2025 10:31 PM |
| Steve Verkman and Clean Sweep Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 55 | 08-30-2015 11:22 AM |
| Clean Sweep Auctions? | jimjim | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 06-25-2015 11:35 PM |
| Clean Sweep Auctions | sports-rings | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 09-20-2013 03:23 PM |
| Question re: Clean Sweep/Verkman Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 05-09-2004 03:48 PM |
Hybrid Mode
