 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-05-2025, 11:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
1966 Series 6
|
|
#2
02-05-2025, 11:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1966 series 6
|
|
#3
02-05-2025, 11:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1966 series 6
|
|
#4
02-05-2025, 12:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-09-2025 at 10:01 PM. Reason: Correction
|
|
#5
02-05-2025, 12:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it might be Bill McCool under McAuliffe but if it is then that creates a problem with Ellsworth to the left of McCool because Ellsworth isn't under Klippstein, so unless this involves a row change then one or the other can't be right.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#6
02-05-2025, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This was sitting in plain sight for so long earlier on this thread - Phillies team under Hargan. The only cards it could be (gray color, not in another row already) were Hargan, Banks and Linz. The thickness variations in the visible border make it a cinch for Hargan. This creates another 5 card partial column - Hargan, Phillies, Buchek, Wynn and Ferrara.
|
|
#7
02-05-2025, 05:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was going to argue again about why Hatton was over the A's team instead of the Phillies - even though Phillies is under Hargan, could be under Hatton on the other slit - but since Hatton is now confirmed next to Wyatt, this places him in a 3 card partial column and since Phillies team is in a 5 card partial, well that's that. Hatton over the A's team.
|
|
#8
02-05-2025, 06:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-05-2025 at 06:41 PM. Reason: Grammar
|
|
#9
02-05-2025, 11:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
| FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
| FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
| 1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
| 1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |
Hybrid Mode
