![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think I figured out two more, the card to the right of Grady Hatton has a divot in the black area that matches up with Johnny Wyatt, and the card to the right of Barry Latman has two humps that matches up with Camilo Carreon. All four of the cards have 3x quantities but I have Carreon as the right edge card of a 4x row, but I am beginning to think Carreon is a 3x and not a 4x.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I placed the cards next to each other and I think I was able to cut the Klippstein off to where it shows the necessary thickness of black and yet show no hint of lettering - I also think I noticed a couple barely perceptible flaws in the black border that seemed to match, but my eyes could have been playing tricks on me. So, it's been a while so I thought I'd summarize our progress thus far: We have the following row sections: Banks-McDaniel Coleman-Red Sox Rookies O'Donoghue-Buchek Latman-Carreon Ferrara-Bennett Hatton-Wyatt Jimenez-Phillies Team Radatz-Klippstein-McAuliffe Green-Linz We have 9 total, so at least 2 are part of one of the other 7. In terms of Columns: #1 Aaron Nuxhall Fox Moeller Skinner Gonzalez Cubs Rookies (despite my earlier posts showing odd colors under an Aaron) #10: Buford Latman Azcue #11: Hamilton 6th Checklist 7th Checklist Wood Giants Rookies Carreon Edwards We can identify the partial 10th column because of the Latman/Carreon horizontal pairing. We have these partial columns linked because of other horizontal pairings: Gibbon Braves Rookies Coleman to the left of Hannan Schofield Red Sox Rookies Radatz Rollins to the left of Blefary Klippstein Wyatt Cannizzaro Belinsky Jimenez O'Donoghue Bennett Johnson to the left of Phillies Team Buchek Wynn Ferrara We have the other partial columns: Bunker Lee Richardson Rodgers Lolich Yankees Rookies Bressoud Oliva Simmons Ellsworth Howard McDowell Bragan Roznovsky Kline Barber The following cards still have no known vertical or horizontal matches: Pirates Rookies Bailey Covington Podres Stuart Face McCool Stanky A's Team Cardenal Hargan Wilhelm Stigman Woodeshick Friend Bearnarth Please check my math. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bailey, 485, is below either a RS or Pirate. My initial thpught was Stigman, 512, but I'm not positive.
Also, recall that O'donoghue is below two different cards. Certainly 458, but also a Twin/Red 1966_485_Pitt-Bos.jpg 1966_501_TC_blue.jpg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Covington is below either Angel/Brave and above a Chi
1966_484_miscuts.jpg I have a H pair of 447-459 (Ellsworth-McCool initially thought to be Oliva by changed our mind. still TBD), and a vertical grouping of 515-450-489-447 (Howard-Oliva-Simmons-Ellsworth) And Friend is below an orange card, perhaps Covington?? 1966_519_TC_orange.jpg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Instead of a Chicago player, it might simply be a color shift and perhaps it is Friend below Covington
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I went back through the thread and spotted a couple that were overlooked. Grady Hatton is above the the Athletics Team card. If Dick Ellsworth is a 4x he has Bill McCool to his right, if he is a 3x he has Tony Oliva to his right. Ellsworth is one of those cards that always has quantities in the gray area for being either a 3x or a 4x. ETA I just noticed that we have Ellsworth and Oliva in the same column so it has to be McCool to the right of Ellsworth. Ellsworth probably is a 4x, it is a notorious card because it pictures Ken Hubbs so the demand for it likely keeps its' quantities down.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-05-2025 at 10:10 AM. Reason: Addition |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I came to the conclusion that it is Dick Stigman above Bob Bailey when comparing Stigman to the miscut.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |