Poll Should GA disclose that the PSA 6.5 and SGC MIN SIZE Dimaggios are same card?

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

My next thread will be on T206s.

You really need to clear that with Ryan, first.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Lorewalker

You really need to clear that with Ryan, first.

I will do so at a break from recruiting votes.

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

I wonder if it's not recruiting votes as much as it is people reacting to the various turns of the discussion.

[G1911]

When it was 79 no to 78 yes, discussion needed to immediately stop and the yes voters needed to shut up and get over it.

When it is 89 no to 95 yes, the vote might be rigged and Peter probably cheated to bring voters to the poll button.

Do you have alt accounts Peter? Why didn't you freeze the poll at the moment the No's were up by 1? Do you have a swarm of alt accounts or have you imporperly influenced voters to push them to vote Yes through unfair means? This is so wrong.

In reality, it's been within a handful of votes of exactly 50/50 the entire time.

Now, I believe by the rule of Ryan, anyone who voted No has to cut the cope and get over it until that option is winning again, in which case Yes voters must shut up.

[Peter_Spaeth]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2uRRDV63ns

[BobbyStrawberry]

I was approached by recruiters from both sides. Ultimately, I went with the highest offer.

(I'm kidding, for those who might have missed it.)

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by G1911

When it was 79 no to 78 yes, discussion needed to immediately stop and the yes voters needed to shut up and get over it.

When it is 89 no to 95 yes, the vote might be rigged and Peter probably cheated to bring voters to the poll button.

Do you have alt accounts Peter? Why didn't you freeze the poll at the moment the No's were up by 1? Do you have a swarm of alt accounts or have you imporperly influenced voters to push them to vote Yes through unfair means? This is so wrong.

In reality, it's been within a handful of votes of exactly 50/50 the entire time.

Now, I believe by the rule of Ryan, anyone who voted No has to cut the cope and get over it until that option is winning again, in which case Yes voters must shut up.

Honestly I do not believe Ryan spent more than 45 seconds reading either thread. His comment was directed at the 4 or 5 people who have ruined Net54 for everyone (including, ironically, the 4 or 5 people). The topic had nothing to do with it.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Lorewalker

Honestly I do not believe Ryan spent more than 45 seconds reading either thread. His comment was directed at the 4 or 5 people who have ruined Net54 for everyone (including, ironically, the 4 or 5 people). The topic had nothing to do with it.

Apologies for ruining it for everyone. I’m trying to cut back!

[JollyElm]

Definitely vote harvesting!!
I demand Leon disclose the names and locations of the last 10-15 new Net54 members to suddenly join up. If they all share the same address at a nursing home somewhere, then we have our answer.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Lorewalker

Honestly I do not believe Ryan spent more than 45 seconds reading either thread. His comment was directed at the 4 or 5 people who have ruined Net54 for everyone (including, ironically, the 4 or 5 people). The topic had nothing to do with it.

I don't care to try and read minds, the second paragraph comically demanded that everyone ("if you are in the minority", explicitly not the 4-5) who voted yes get over it, at 78-79. I'm going to enjoy the laugh when people post really stupid things and take victory laps far too early.

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

Another thread where (generally the same) 4-5 people monopolize the airtime, argue in circles, and kill the thread making reading it unbearable for everyone other than the 4-5 monopolizers.

Bottom line is that 150 people have voted and the majority feel that GA should not (or need not) disclose the situation. End of story. If you are in the minority, get over it.