Let’s rehash the Bond Bread controversy.

[Johnphotoman]

As many of you know this post is a work in progress, it is a living breathing post the final assessment has not been made. Understand as new information comes in, theories and thoughts in this post can change.

New information has come to my attention to where I have to make a retraction: I posted to Pat R in post 149 of this thread; the cards in question would be placed in the "Festberg" find because of the backs, based on the information we had at the time.

Quote: “Pat: What we now know teaches that the images in post #53 of the old thread (cards of your friend) are from the Festburg cards discovered in NJ 1980s- Ivory / Beige paper stock, squared corners, 2 ¼ x 3 ½, .1mm thick, weight 1 gram. It could be the same set… from the letter from The Sporting News from the 1980s…from Stanley Apfelbaum see post 140 in this thread.”

With the help of butchie t we were able to determine we cannot place the cards from post #53 from Pat R in the old post from Ted Z, in the category of the "Festberg" find.

What we had discover - the backs of the cards from: the Festberg find, butchie t cards from, the Baseball card society letter, cards I bought that were believed to be from the Festberg find, cards I bought from a collector who collected the cards circa 1940s first hand…all have the same backs.

Therefore what we can say, is the cards from Pat R: are circa 1940s and could come from any of the above sets. As to date, the above cards should be categorized square trading cards under the umbrella of “Bond Bread” cards, not inserted into loaves of bread, circa 1940s.

Images below 1st card from a collector who collected circa 1940s, 2nd card believed form Festberg find, 3rd from scan from BCS from butchie t, 4th from what is believed from the 24 cards set issued circa 1940s. - 1950s.
John.