NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2025, 06:07 PM
robw1959 robw1959 is offline
Rob
Rob.ert We.ekes
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,561
Default

You did better on the Christy portrait, for sure! And I think the straight Young portrait SGC 1.5 is a slight improvement on the PSA 2 with the MK qualifier. However, the SGC 1.5 Johnson portrait, I think, was better left alone as a PSA 3(MK). Overall, it appears to be pretty close to a wash on the decision to regrade them. That's my two cents.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2025, 06:09 PM
Mark17's Avatar
Mark17 Mark17 is offline
M@rk S@tterstr0m
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,222
Default

Out of curiosity, what was the total cost of the re-grading?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2025, 06:15 PM
BioCRN BioCRN is offline
Ԝiꞁꞁ Τհоꭑpѕоn
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 571
Default

Unless the back on Mathewson is torn the hell up, 1 is a harsh initial grade.

I'm a huge fan of the 1.5's in my collection (or 2.5's and under for SGC because they allow marks and noticeable staining up to 2.5).

The "eye appeal" on many 1.5's is greater than a slew of 2-4+ I've seen over the years. Yeah, there's generally a major flaw, but a good looking card is a good looking card.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2025, 07:47 PM
Hankphenom Hankphenom is offline
Hank Thomas
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,016
Default

Those are great-looking cards!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2025, 08:05 PM
p1ayba11 p1ayba11 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 28
Default

To answer a couple questions. I paid $85/card for grading plus shipping both ways. Also, I’m attaching a pic here of the backs of cards.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_6965.jpg (173.5 KB, 628 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2025, 10:19 PM
Epps's Avatar
Epps Epps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 649
Default

I’d say regardless of grade, those are beautiful cards. The backs look a lot better than what I anticipated off of the grades. The fronts are super sharp as well. Amazing eye appeal on those!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2025, 10:23 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cardboard Land
Posts: 8,132
Default

I like the qualifiers, because it tells you directly what the issue is. For instance, without the 'MK,' someone looking at the card may wonder a couple of things, like, "How much did the mark lower the grade overall? Would it be a 3 without it? A two?" Also, since the mark is so small, it's possible they might even think, "Wait, did they miss seeing the mark when they graded it?"

Having the 'MK' on it eliminates all of that.

To me, the original grade tells you exactly what grade they think the card deserves, while specifically pointing out it ALSO has a mark on it.

Unfortunately, if you're looking to sell a card, what I said probably won't come into play. So many collectors abhor any and all qualifiers.

They definitely look pretty sweet in the tuxedos!!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2025, 11:03 PM
raulus raulus is offline
Nicol0 Pin.oli
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 2,710
Default

Hopefully you like them better in the new slabs.

Personally, I’m not convinced the juice would be worth the squeeze. But if you’re planning to sell, hopefully the new grades will offset the grading cost, and leave a little extra?
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left:

1968 American Oil left side
1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 PM.


ebay GSB