Posting Pictures WAY Too Large on the Forum

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Balticfox

Check out post #202 from this thread:

https://www.net54baseball.com/showth...=283972&page=5

An actual image of very decent size surrounded by acres and acres of useless blank space which seriously mess up the screen view.

I was going to delete it but that is a great example of what will be deleted, so folks can see the issue.
.

[Huck]

Originally Posted by Leon

I was going to delete it but that is a great example of what will be deleted, so folks can see the issue.
.

Guilty. On my screen the image looks fine. Until the picture is loaded to the site, I don't see the acres of white space. I am not quite sure how to eliminate the white space. Resizing will likely shift the image out of frame, but I will try.

[Balticfox]

Originally Posted by Huck

Guilty. On my screen the image looks fine. Until the picture is loaded to the site, I don't see the acres of white space. I am not quite sure how to eliminate the white space.

Crop! It's a standard procedure.

[Peter_Spaeth]

I don't do social media. Therefore, this site is not social media.
I actually agree with Fox here. Sure, you can use a sweeping definition that would include forums such as this one, but anyone with sense also knows the difference. This ain't Facebook. It's not a platform. It's a chat board.

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I don't do social media. Therefore, this site is not social media.
I actually agree with Fox here. Sure, you can use a sweeping definition that would include forums such as this one, but anyone with sense also knows the difference. This ain't Facebook. It's not a platform. It's a chat board.

It's a platform. Somewhat different in style to facebook, but serves an identical puprose. Pretend the difference is meaningful if it makes you feel better, but this site is for social networking. Period.

[Peter_Spaeth]

No likes. No followers. No universal membership. No official communications from governments and elected officials, no drivel from celebrities and others pointlessly documenting their every move and thought. Small number of people discussing a specific, narrow area of interest. Different enough for me.

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

No likes. No followers. No universal membership. No official communications from governments and elected officials, no drivel from celebrities. Different enough for me.

I suppose if you narrow the definition of anything enough, it would lose all applications. Facebook is one type of social media networking. But that doesn't make it the only type.