PWCC Eye Appeal Stickers

[Peter_Spaeth]

According to Betsy, Brent did the stickers. I think she posted it here, it's possible it was a personal conversation.

Looks like Brent said so as well, though not sure what John was referencing.

https://www.net54baseball.com/showpo...2&postcount=34

Maybe Baker started doing them at some point, but it was Brent in the first years of the program.

With everything else going on at PWCC, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to deduce the sticker program was probably not entirely clean either.

[perezfan]

Those idiotic stickered cards are the last ones I’d ever bid on. All the sticker does is increase the odds that the card was “worked” on.

No thanks.

[Peter_Spaeth]

2019 email from Betsy Huigens.

From: PWCC Customer Service
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 9:20 PM
To: ----------
Subject: Re: HE and PQ Designation

Thanks for the feedback. It doesn't put us in an awkward spot at all; I'm glad you shared it. I'm sorry you and your colleagues have not been issued one of our eye appeal designations.

I can assure you that this process is completely unbiased; when Brent does his review he does so for the entire auction after the cards have been sorted by sport, year, and issue. This is after any affiliation with any particular submitter has been removed. So there is no way for Brent to know who the submitter is of any of the cards when he does his review. The unbiased nature of this process remains the most important part for us to ensure a quality, consistent outcome. For reference, we are only issuing designations on 30-50 items per auction so it is quite rare for these designations to be issued.

Does this help answer your questions?



Thank you!



Betsy Huigens

PWCC Marketplace

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

2019 email from Betsy Huigens.

From: PWCC Customer Service
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 9:20 PM
...
when Brent does his review he does so for the entire auction after the cards have been sorted by sport, year, and issue.
...

This is dated April 29, 2019. That's the week before their PWCC-A, PWCC-E, and PWCC-S sticker program went live. I believe the first sales were beginning of May 2019, if I recall correctly from my database. I'm sure Brent started the program. But you're a fool if you think he was the main guy sitting there examining every card that went through their doors for stickers for years on end. He taught a team of two guys what he wants them to look for and they've been doing it ever since (what their hire date was, I don't know. But they've been there for several years now. Brent had better things to do with his time than put stickers on cards all day. If you want their names, I'm sure I can get them for you. It's not exactly a secret. Plenty of people in the hobby know them. They are responsible for 99.9% of all the PWCC stickers out there.

Mike Baker never did the stickers for PWCC. His stickers are a completely separate company. He just leased an office in the same complex as PWCC so that he could run his business easier with access to their vault. But the stickers he put on the cards were still his MBA stickers for his customers with cards in the PWCC vault. He never put PWCC stickers on cards or evaluated cards for PWCC.

[Aaron Seefeldt]

Personally I like getting stickers on cards I send there from REA, HA, ML, etc. I just got a top 30% sticker on a Morehouse Baking Thorpe card last week so I assume it’s not Brent doing it since he’s gone. It’s also a Fanatics sticker. I also got a top 15% sticker on t206 Cobb Uzit I had sent there from REA last summer.

I don’t understand why anybody would remove the stickers… even if they only add 1 or 2%, heck that’s a lot of added value based on today’s prices.

I’m including pix since every thread needs a card.

[Snapolit1]

Is this entire hobby just about people seeking validation from others and paying for it? If you have a cool card and there’s no one around to oooh and ahhh and say “attaboy good job” is that like the proverbial tree falling in a forest? Self esteem and validation for sale. Just need the right color sticker to feel good about what you are doing.

[calvindog]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Is this entire hobby just about people seeking validation from others and paying for it? If you have a cool card and there’s no one around to oooh and ahhh and say “attaboy good job” is that like the proverbial tree falling in a forest? Self esteem and validation for sale. Just need the right color sticker to feel good about what you are doing.

How can you see this as anything other than adding a few dollars to your card’s value? Here’s the only way to look at it: does the existence of the sticker on the card bother you so much that you’re willing to pay to remove it? It’s really as simple as that. Even the idiots in the hobby recognize this.

[Keith H. Thompson]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Is this entire hobby just about people seeking validation from others and paying for it? If you have a cool card and there’s no one around to oooh and ahhh and say “attaboy good job” is that like the proverbial tree falling in a forest? Self esteem and validation for sale. Just need the right color sticker to feel good about what you are doing.

I think there is evidence in many NET54 threads to support this opinion to various degrees but my own opinion is that in whatever guise a card may be; graded, stickered, raw, slabbed, it is only the card that can speak for itself, and I follow this practice. Or do I? I'm sure I try to impress my friends.

[bandrus1]

Originally Posted by Aaron Seefeldt

Personally I like getting stickers on cards I send there from REA, HA, ML, etc. I just got a top 30% sticker on a Morehouse Baking Thorpe card last week so I assume it’s not Brent doing it since he’s gone. It’s also a Fanatics sticker. I also got a top 15% sticker on t206 Cobb Uzit I had sent there from REA last summer.

I don’t understand why anybody would remove the stickers… even if they only add 1 or 2%, heck that’s a lot of added value based on today’s prices.

I’m including pix since every thread needs a card.

Isn't the thorpe like population 1?

[calvindog]

I recall the first time I received a card with the sticker on the back - I removed it. Who wants the sticker on their card? But when I saw it somehow added some value to a potential sales price I did a simple equation in my head: is the extra money in a future sale worth having to tolerate the sticker on the back? To me the sticker is relatively unobtrusive so I kept them on. At the end of the day, all our cards are to be sold in the future by us anyway. Even if we’re all diehard collectors.

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by Snowman

Mike Baker never did the stickers for PWCC. His stickers are a completely separate company. He just leased an office in the same complex as PWCC so that he could run his business easier with access to their vault. But the stickers he put on the cards were still his MBA stickers for his customers with cards in the PWCC vault. He never put PWCC stickers on cards or evaluated cards for PWCC.

Brent owns MBA.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Snowman

This is dated April 29, 2019. That's the week before their PWCC-A, PWCC-E, and PWCC-S sticker program went live. I believe the first sales were beginning of May 2019, if I recall correctly from my database. I'm sure Brent started the program. But you're a fool if you think he was the main guy sitting there examining every card that went through their doors for stickers for years on end. He taught a team of two guys what he wants them to look for and they've been doing it ever since (what their hire date was, I don't know. But they've been there for several years now. Brent had better things to do with his time than put stickers on cards all day. If you want their names, I'm sure I can get them for you. It's not exactly a secret. Plenty of people in the hobby know them. They are responsible for 99.9% of all the PWCC stickers out there.

Mike Baker never did the stickers for PWCC. His stickers are a completely separate company. He just leased an office in the same complex as PWCC so that he could run his business easier with access to their vault. But the stickers he put on the cards were still his MBA stickers for his customers with cards in the PWCC vault. He never put PWCC stickers on cards or evaluated cards for PWCC.

The previous high end sticker program had been in place since at least June 2015, four years prior, when I posted about it.
https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=206630
So Brent had done the reviews himself (despite having better things to do with his time) for those four years, according to Betsy. How am I a "fool" to think Brent continued to do the reviews?

[perezfan]

And why should we care about some criminal’s opinion of whether the assigned grade is accurate or not? Wouldn’t it depend largely on WHEN the card was graded? Did he vomit out his vaunted opinion when PSA and SGC were more lenient, and grading far easier 4-5 years ago?

Or were the “King’s” misguided opinions issued AFTER the TPGs adopted their new tougher standards (now grading 1-2 points lower than previously). Wouldn’t this now render the stickers useless and passé?

It’s mind-boggling how many otherwise smart/rational people are taken in by the scam, and live in need of others’ validation.

[tjisonline]

Some people need validation of their purchases. Shrug.

Originally Posted by perezfan

And why should we care about some criminal’s opinion of whether the assigned grade is accurate or not? Wouldn’t it depend largely on WHEN the card was graded? Did he vomit out his vaunted opinion when PSA and SGC were more lenient, and grading far easier 4-5 years ago?

Or were the “King’s” misguided opinions issued AFTER the TPGs adopted their new tougher standards (now grading 1-2 points lower than previously). Wouldn’t this now render the stickers useless and passé?

It’s mind-boggling how many otherwise smart/rational people are taken in by the scam, and live in need of others’ validation.

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by perezfan

And why should we care about some criminal’s opinion of whether the assigned grade is accurate or not? Wouldn’t it depend largely on WHEN the card was graded? Did he vomit out his vaunted opinion when PSA and SGC were more lenient, and grading far easier 4-5 years ago?

For a few reasons: 1) Because they have the card in hand and you don't. 2) Because they know how to grade cards and most buyers don't. 3) Because they evaluate cards for eye-appeal all day every day, and they have a pretty good pulse on what most of these cards *should* look like.

A few people earlier suggested that the reason people like the stickers is because it somehow validates their cards to them, or in some way makes them better because it shows that someone else gave it the thumbs up too. But this is missing the mark. The reason the market values the stickers is because of the points I listed above. The most important of which is they have the card in hand and you don't. Cards often have hidden flaws, especially in the low to mid grade range, and we as buyers are left to wonder whether or not a card has a flaw that we can't see. On ebay, we often ask sellers directly if there any creases we can't see, or for additional pictures, etc. The stickers provide the buyer with a sense of security, knowing that someone who knows what they're doing has evaluated the card in hand, and they think it is one of the best examples you can find in that grade, and/or that it is even under-graded. That information is valuable in a market where 99% of transactions occur online these days. Especially since the grading companies are wildly inconsistent with their grades and do not publish grading notes/flaws for cards. Seeing a card in a PSA 4 holder is merely a starting point for most buyers. If I know that a card in a PSA 4 holder will regrade as a 5 or better with near certainty, then I'm going to bid accordingly. But if I don't know if there are hidden flaws on a PSA 4, then I'm not going to bid it to the moon because the risks that it will always be a PSA 4 at best are too high. So I'll just bid as if it's a 4.

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

The previous high end sticker program had been in place since at least June 2015, four years prior, when I posted about it.
https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=206630
So Brent had done the reviews himself (despite having better things to do with his time) for those four years, according to Betsy. How am I a "fool" to think Brent continued to do the reviews?

The previous sticker program was different though, they just said something like "High-end". That was back when PWCC was a much smaller company. Brent did most of everything himself in the early years until he exceeded his own bandwidth. But once they/the hobby grew exponentially, and after he started the A/E/S sticker program in 2019, he trained two guys how to do his sticker program and they've been doing it ever since. Nearly every A/E/S sticker you see today was put on the slabs by those two guys.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Snowman

The previous sticker program was different though, they just said something like "High-end". That was back when PWCC was a much smaller company. Brent did most of everything himself in the early years until he exceeded his own bandwidth. But once they/the hobby grew exponentially, and after he started the A/E/S sticker program in 2019, he trained two guys how to do his sticker program and they've been doing it ever since. Nearly every A/E/S sticker you see today was put on the slabs by those two guys.

PWCC was running huge auctions 2015-2019. These were not the "early years" that would be the 2000s. So if Brent was doing all the reviews, he was spending considerable time doing it. He may well have handed off the program eventually, not disputing that. Also, at some point while Brent was doing the reviews (2018), it became more than just "high end" it was "HE" and "PQ" or something like that.