 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-17-2024, 11:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Agree with what everyone has posted. Great looking card for the grade. The 8 on the back prevents SGC from grading it higher. PSA would likely give you a 3MK. I think it looks great in the SGC holder and were you to sell it, it would sell for a premium above what 1.5s sell for.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y 
|
|
#2
11-18-2024, 12:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I very much appreciate all the feedback. I’ll be holding the card in my PC, I like how it looks in the holder, and am not hung up over the ink on the back. It shows superbly! Just wish it had a 2 on it rather than the 1.5!
My take is that SGC’s grading scale for a 2 allows for one or more defects, including ink, so I felt a 2 was in the cards. Also, when I put my 1.5 next to the WaJo below I can’t help but feel SGC played hardball with the grading. Thanks again to all that shared their views.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1952 Topps Baseball - Perspectives | Avardan | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 24 | 10-31-2023 12:12 PM |
| National: Any Seller's perspectives? | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 08-05-2023 06:31 PM |
| seeking low grade C55, C56, C57 | t213 | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 1 | 10-18-2010 03:33 PM |
| seeking low grade T213-1 | t213 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 11-20-2009 08:15 PM |
| Seeking a low grade D304 | t213 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 10-01-2009 07:05 PM |
Hybrid Mode
