![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Here, look again and compare: ![]() ![]() ![]() Shape of the head is wrong ... skin color wrong ... ears are too big ... teeth too big ... |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I’d agree. Judged on the aesthetics alone and not what we know of the card - I don’t think it looks fantastic. But of course it’s iconic, and has been for a long time, so most of that is just out the window at this point. The ‘68 Topps Ryan / Koosman is another example of a card like that. I won’t call it downright ugly, but it’s certainly not the prettiest card ever made. But it’s become an icon unto itself, so nobody really cares. The one card you actually hear this subject discussed around a lot is the ‘63 Rose. Arguably the ugliest pricey card ever made… Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 11-14-2024 at 11:16 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Top 3 — Most Important | LincolnVT | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 99 | 10-09-2023 06:45 PM |
When Did RC Become Most Important? | todeen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 71 | 10-02-2022 08:09 PM |
Photos are important! | ajjohnsonsoxfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-11-2015 07:51 PM |
Jay Miller....need to ask you important ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 05-21-2006 10:46 AM |
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-02-2006 06:49 PM |