![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd be willing to guess that people at PSA wouldn't have a clue about whether to give it the MK qualifier or not. In this case, I bet PSA just missed it.
What is the rule of thumb on back stamps/overprints as it pertains to the hobby (not grading)?
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA (MK) Qualifier | STL1944 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 09-08-2016 05:02 PM |
Would this get a MK qualifier? | JoeyFarino | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-29-2015 11:38 AM |
(ST) PSA Qualifier | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-10-2015 05:30 PM |
PSA with qualifier vs SGC | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-10-2012 06:04 PM |
PSA qualifier & pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 09-20-2002 01:38 AM |