 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
11-09-2024, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Card
Vintagedeputy-
I too believe PSA missed this one for sure, by their own standards. There very much should be one of those dreaded qualifiers on this card. If I was czar, PSA would be forced to drop the stupid qualifiers and reflect the presence of the stamp in a uniform way- i.e, stamps drop a grade by 2 full points, so the card in question could be a PSA 3 without qualifier. 2nd question you posed- there are FAR too many people on this site who can't stay on topic, or who wish to divert the topic for their own ends. When you bring it up, their feelings get hurt. Trent King 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA (MK) Qualifier | STL1944 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 09-08-2016 05:02 PM |
| Would this get a MK qualifier? | JoeyFarino | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-29-2015 11:38 AM |
| (ST) PSA Qualifier | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-10-2015 05:30 PM |
| PSA with qualifier vs SGC | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-10-2012 06:04 PM |
| PSA qualifier & pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 09-20-2002 01:38 AM |
Threaded Mode