![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Of course, I’ve heard of those cards before, but I look at it differently. The card was issued by the manufacturer without the stamp. Any alteration to that card like an ink stamp should result in a qualifier because it was done after production. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If the end user added a backstamp or other writing then the card would not be as "Issued" and deserving of a qualifier. But the youg person who took Whitey home that day took it home as issued by the Nurse. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Perhaps as a way to track what cards were given out. Anyone recall the "TB tine test?" I don't like needles at all, and getting stuck with the Katyusha rocket of needles (Ok, it was only 5 at once, but still 5x worse than one) was the makings of a bad day. A free baseball card would have gone a long way to making it "better" or at least more tolerable. Maybe the stamps were to indicate ones given out for taking that test or some other test? Or, just similar to the Carousel discs which were blank backed MSA discs rubber stamped with the store stamp before issue. Or as mentioned, the many stamps issued with back stamps for a variety of purposes, from repurposing a set to identifying the individual who packed the product. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a post war collector and the only pre war set I collect is the 1923 Fleer set, and I only collect it as an extention of my post war Fleer run, 1959-2007. The cards are just W 515 cards with a Feer back stamp. I assume Fleer obtained some and stamped them post production or maybe under a license agreement.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is great, poster gets butthurt about a pretty harmless, fairly obvious gender joke and then uses a derogatory slur that is more offensive then the joke.
We were all thinking the same thing... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[QUOTE=Bpm0014;2474535]This is great, poster gets butthurt about a pretty harmless, fairly obvious gender joke and then uses a derogatory slur that is more offensive then the joke.
We were all thinking the same thing...[/Q I WAS DEFINITELY NOT THINKING THE SAME THING. Speak for yourself. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA (MK) Qualifier | STL1944 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 09-08-2016 05:02 PM |
Would this get a MK qualifier? | JoeyFarino | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-29-2015 11:38 AM |
(ST) PSA Qualifier | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-10-2015 05:30 PM |
PSA with qualifier vs SGC | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-10-2012 06:04 PM |
PSA qualifier & pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 09-20-2002 01:38 AM |