
10-29-2024, 07:24 PM
|
J@son Per1
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 810
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
This is a perfect example, guy. I said that Perry and Ryan are "pretty similar" in regards to their career values. Let's see.
Ryan: 324-292, 112 ERA+, 5,386 IP, 1.247 WHIP, 83.6 WAR
Perry: 314-265, 117 ERA+, 5,350 IP, 1.181 WHIP, 90.0 WAR
Well, looks like they are, in fact, pretty similar in regards to their actual career values.
They produced similar careers and values, but Ryan had the highlight reel, the press, the flashy K's (and forgotten walks) and the dedicated fanbase while Perry did not. I understand that many people are not interested in using the math or value or anything like that, and follow an emotion or who they like or who had the PR, or the highlight reel, or single game accomplishments. I do not understand why many of these people object that other people use math to evaluate instead.
|
My career is based around math. Analysis is part art and part science. You referenced a group of similar numbers and say they are basically the same guy. Clearly when you look at factors beyond the W/L and WAR, they aren’t.
|